Authentic Gettier Cases: a reply to Starmans and Friedman

Cognition 129 (3):666-669 (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Do laypeople and philosophers differ in their attributions of knowledge? Starmans and Friedman maintain that laypeople differ from philosophers in taking ‘authentic evidence’ Gettier cases to be cases of knowledge. Their reply helpfully clarifies the distinction between ‘authentic evidence’ and ‘apparent evidence’. Using their sharpened presentation of this distinction, we contend that the argument of our original paper still stands

Similar books and articles

Folk Knowledge Attributions and the Protagonist Projection Hypothesis.Adrian Ziółkowski - 2021 - In Tania Lombrozo, Joshua Knobe & Shaun Nichols (eds.), Oxford Studies in Experimental Philosophy, vol 4. Oxford University Press. pp. 5-29.
Knowledge as de re true belief?Paul Egré - 2017 - Synthese 194 (5):1517-1529.
Perceptual Capacities, Knowledge, and Gettier Cases.Susanna Schellenberg - 2017 - In Rodrigo Borges, Claudio de Almeida & Peter David Klein (eds.), Explaining Knowledge: New Essays on the Gettier Problem. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press. pp. 74-95.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-08-12

Downloads
1,019 (#13,701)

6 months
115 (#39,025)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Jennifer Nagel
University of Toronto, Mississauga

References found in this work

Discrimination and perceptual knowledge.Alvin I. Goldman - 1976 - Journal of Philosophy 73 (November):771-791.
Survey-Driven Romanticism.Simon Cullen - 2010 - Review of Philosophy and Psychology 1 (2):275-296.

View all 18 references / Add more references