Divine omniscience and experience: A Reply to Alter
Ars Disputandi 3 (2003)
According to one antitheist argument, the necessarily omniscient, necessarily omnipotent, and necessarily omnibenevolent Anselmian God does not exist, because if God is necessarily omnipotent it is impossible for Him to comprehend fully certain concepts, such as fear, frustration and despair, that an omniscient being needs to possess. Torin Alter examines this argument and provides three elaborate objections to it. I argue that theists would not accept any of them because they con ict with traditional Judaeo-Christian doctrines concerning divine attributes.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Omniscience and Worthiness of Worship.Wesley D. Cray - 2011 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 70 (2):147-153.
Similar books and articles
Divine Omniscience and Knowledge de Se.Yujin Nagasawa - 2003 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 53 (2):73-82.
On Two Alleged Conflicts Between Divine Attributes.Torin Alter - 2002 - Faith and Philosophy 19 (1):47-57.
Timelessness, Omniscience, and Tenses.Laura L. Garcia - 1993 - Journal of Philosophical Research 18:65-82.
Divine Omnipotence and Divine Omniscience: A Reply to Michael Martin.Noreen E. Johnson - 2007 - Sophia 46 (1):69-73.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads673 ( #1,799 of 2,178,195 )
Recent downloads (6 months)42 ( #5,736 of 2,178,195 )
How can I increase my downloads?