Why 'Willusionism' Leads to 'Bad Results': Comments on Baumeister, Crescioni, and Alquist

Neuroethics 4 (1):17-24 (2009)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Drawing on results discussed in the target article by Baumeister et al. (1), I argue that the claim that the modern mind sciences are discovering that free will is an illusion ( willusionism ) is ambiguous and depends on how ordinary people understand free will. When interpreted in ways that the evidence does not justify, the willusionist claim can lead to ‘bad results.’ That is, telling people that free will is an illusion leads people to cheat more, help less, and behave more aggressively, but these responses may be based on people’s interpreting willusionist claims to mean that they lack the powers of rational choice and self-control

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 90,593

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-08-03

Downloads
164 (#108,538)

6 months
7 (#175,814)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Eddy Nahmias
Georgia State University

References found in this work

The Significance of Free Will.Robert Kane - 1996 - New York, US: Oxford University Press USA.
The Illusion of Conscious Will.Daniel M. Wegner - 2002 - Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.
Effective intentions: the power of conscious will.Alfred R. Mele - 2009 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Is Incompatibilism Intuitive?Jason Turner, Eddy Nahmias, Stephen Morris & Thomas Nadelhoffer - 2007 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 73 (1):28-53.
The Significance of Free Will.Robert Kane - 1996 - Philosophical and Phenomenological Research 60 (1):129-134.

View all 16 references / Add more references