Why 'Willusionism' Leads to 'Bad Results': Comments on Baumeister, Crescioni, and Alquist

Neuroethics 4 (1):17-24 (2011)
Abstract
Drawing on results discussed in the target article by Baumeister et al. (1), I argue that the claim that the modern mind sciences are discovering that free will is an illusion ( willusionism ) is ambiguous and depends on how ordinary people understand free will. When interpreted in ways that the evidence does not justify, the willusionist claim can lead to ‘bad results.’ That is, telling people that free will is an illusion leads people to cheat more, help less, and behave more aggressively, but these responses may be based on people’s interpreting willusionist claims to mean that they lack the powers of rational choice and self-control
Keywords Free will  Self-control  Choice
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s12152-009-9047-7
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 32,688
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
The Significance of Free Will.Robert Kane - 1996 - Oxford University Press USA.
Is Incompatibilism Intuitive?Jason Turner - 2006 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 73 (1):28-53.
Scientific Challenges to Free Will.Eddy Nahmias - 2010 - In C. Sandis & T. O'Connor (eds.), A Companion to the Philosophy of Action. Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 345-356.

View all 11 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
The Moral Psychology of Determinism.Jeremy Evans - 2013 - Philosophical Psychology 26 (5):639-661.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Added to PP index
2009-08-03

Total downloads
91 ( #65,743 of 2,237,274 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
4 ( #141,887 of 2,237,274 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature