It ain't necessarily so: An essay review of intelligent design creationism and its critics: Philosophical, theological, and scientific perspectives
Philosophy of Science 71 (4):593-604 (2004)
Nature exhibits a rich variety of adaptations. Cells contain complex biomolecular structures, such as proteins, that are exquisitely adapted to perform specific biological functions. Evolutionary biology explains how biomolecular structures evolve. Intelligent design creationists reject evolutionary explanations. They want to believe that all adaptations in nature are the handiwork of God. Their critics aver that “it ain't necessarily so.” The anthology under review is an excellent display of the issues between intelligent design creationists and their critics. I agree with the critics.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Sober on Intelligent Design. [REVIEW]Sahotra Sarkar - 2011 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 83 (3):683-691.
How Should Creationism and Intelligent Design Be Dealt with in the Classroom?Michael J. Reiss - 2011 - Journal of Philosophy of Education 45 (3):399-415.
Intelligent Design From the Viewpoint of Complex Systems Theory.Dong Chunyu - 2010 - Frontiers of Philosophy in China 5 (3):461-470.
In Defence of Intelligent Design.William Dembski - 2006 - In Philip Clayton (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Religion and Science. Oxford University Press. pp. 715-731.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads192 ( #22,655 of 2,170,072 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #186,298 of 2,170,072 )
How can I increase my downloads?