Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 13 (4):417-419 (2004)
Abstract |
In November 2003, researchers at Cambridge University announced they had identified a gene associated with an elevated risk of breast and related ovarian cancers. The gene—christened EMSY in honor of a breast-cancer nurse who is the sister of the study's lead author—is particularly significant because it is linked to so-called sporadic cancers. Such cancers do not arise from hereditary mutations of the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes, in which genes that ordinarily prevent breast and ovarian cancers are altered, often giving rise to multiple cases of cancer within a family as the mutation is passed along. The Cambridge researchers determined that the presence of extra copies of EMSY in an individual may instead switch off a healthy BRCA2 gene
|
Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) |
Categories | (categorize this paper) |
DOI | 10.1017/S0963180104134130 |
Options |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Download options
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Attitudes of Rhode Island Primary Care Physicians Toward the Use of Genetic Testing for Breast Cancer.Frances M. Alexakos - unknown
Direct to Confusion: Lessons Learned From Marketing Brca Testing.Ellen Matloff & Arthur Caplan - 2008 - American Journal of Bioethics 8 (6):5 – 8.
The Family Covenant and Genetic Testing.David J. Doukas & Jessica W. Berg - 2001 - American Journal of Bioethics 1 (3):2 – 10.
God, Disease, and Spiritual Dilemmas: Reading the Lives of Women with Breast Cancer.Megan Eide & Ann Milliken Pederson - 2009 - Zygon 44 (1):85-96.
The Right Not to Know: The Case of Psychiatric Disorders.Lisa Bortolotti & Heather Widdows - 2011 - Journal of Medical Ethics 37 (11):673-676.
The Medical Decision-Making Process and the Family: The Case of Breast Cancer Patients and Their Husbands.Roy Gilbar & Ora Gilbar - 2009 - Bioethics 23 (3):183-192.
Genetic Disease, Genetic Testing and the Clinician.Kelly C. Smith - 2001 - Journal of the American Medical Association 285 (1):91.
Argumentation and Risk Communication About Genetic Testing: Challenges for Healthcare Consumers and Implications for Computer Systems.Nancy L. Green - 2012 - Journal of Argumentation in Context 1 (1):113-129.
Collective Fear, Individualized Risk: The Social and Cultural Context of Genetic Testing for Breast Cancer.N. Press, J. R. Fishman & B. A. Koenig - 2000 - Nursing Ethics 7 (3):237-249.
Bioethics and Cancer: When the Professional Becomes Personal.Rebecca Dresser - 2011 - Hastings Center Report 41 (6):14-18.
Autonomy and Freedom of Choice in Prenatal Genetic Diagnosis.Elisabeth Hildt - 2002 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 5 (1):65-72.
Do Patients with Breast Cancer Participating in Clinical Trials Receive Better Nursing Care?Myriam Skrutkowska & Charles Weijer - unknown
After Harm: Medical Error and the Ethics of Forgiveness.Nancy Berlinger - 2005 - Johns Hopkins University Press.
Patient Complains of …: How Medicalization Mediates Power and Justice.Alison Reiheld - 2010 - International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics 3 (1):72-98.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2010-08-24
Total views
19 ( #585,153 of 2,519,862 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #406,012 of 2,519,862 )
2010-08-24
Total views
19 ( #585,153 of 2,519,862 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #406,012 of 2,519,862 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads