Quality of life: The contested rhetoric of resource allocation and end-of-life decision making

Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 29 (6):651 – 664 (2004)
Abstract
The term "quality of life" has a long history in the bioethics literature. It is usually used in one of two contexts: in resource allocation discussions in the hope of arriving at an objective measure of the worth of an intervention; and in end-of-life discussions as a concept that can justify the forgoing of life-sustaining treatment. In both contexts, the term has valid uses as it is meant to measure the efficacy of a treatment. However, the term has the unfortunate rhetorical problem that it often seems to be a judgment on the life of a human being. As such, it is highly inflammatory. We suggest that a return to a rhetoric that suggests a judgment on the treatment rather than the person is needed.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1080/03605310490883000
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 29,820
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
End-of-Life Decision Making Across Cultures.Robert H. Blank - 2011 - Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 39 (2):201-214.
Measuring the Quality of Life: Why, How and What?Matti Häyry - 1991 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 12 (2).
Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total downloads
25 ( #221,511 of 2,210,135 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #222,637 of 2,210,135 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature