Quality of life: The contested rhetoric of resource allocation and end-of-life decision making

Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 29 (6):651 – 664 (2004)

Abstract
The term "quality of life" has a long history in the bioethics literature. It is usually used in one of two contexts: in resource allocation discussions in the hope of arriving at an objective measure of the worth of an intervention; and in end-of-life discussions as a concept that can justify the forgoing of life-sustaining treatment. In both contexts, the term has valid uses as it is meant to measure the efficacy of a treatment. However, the term has the unfortunate rhetorical problem that it often seems to be a judgment on the life of a human being. As such, it is highly inflammatory. We suggest that a return to a rhetoric that suggests a judgment on the treatment rather than the person is needed.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1080/03605310490883000
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 39,566
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

End-of-Life Decision Making Across Cultures.Robert H. Blank - 2011 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 39 (2):201-214.
Measuring the Quality of Life: Why, How and What?Matti Häyry - 1991 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 12 (2).

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
29 ( #262,435 of 2,325,873 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #922,770 of 2,325,873 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature