Replication without replicators

Synthese 179 (3):455-477 (2011)
Abstract
According to a once influential view of selection, it consists of repeated cycles of replication and interaction. It has been argued that this view is wrong: replication is not necessary for evolution by natural selection. I analyze the nine most influential arguments for this claim and defend the replication–interaction conception of selection against these objections. In order to do so, however, the replication–interaction conception of selection needs to be modified significantly. My proposal is that replication is not the copying of an entity, the replicator, but the copying of a property. Thus, we can have a replication process without there being a replicator that is being copied.
Keywords Replication  Interaction  Fitness  Replicators  Clonal organisms  Microbes
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s11229-009-9702-x
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 30,749
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
Evolution and the Levels of Selection.Samir Okasha - 2006 - Oxford University Press.
A World of States of Affairs.D. M. Armstrong - 1993 - Philosophical Perspectives 7 (3):429-440.

View all 63 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Popper's Darwinian Analogy.Bence Nanay - 2011 - Perspectives on Science 19 (3):337-354.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Added to PP index
2009-12-05

Total downloads
68 ( #80,186 of 2,198,095 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
5 ( #44,258 of 2,198,095 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature