Quaestiones Disputatae 7 (2):31-49 (2017)

Stephen Napier
Villanova University
Most philosophers will grant that on some issues and in some circumstances, we can acquire knowledge from another. But when it comes to moral knowledge, the presumption is on the side of autonomy; we must not rely on others for our moral beliefs. I argue here for the surprising thesis that in some circumstances we must rely on others in order to acquire moral knowledge. I believe that this, or something trivially different, is a position that Leibniz would hold. When woven together, his comments on teaching, authority, errors of conscience, and testimony provide concrescent support for this surprising thesis.
Keywords Catholic Tradition  Contemporary Philosophy
Categories No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
ISBN(s) 2150-5756
DOI 10.5840/qd2017723
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 62,363
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

What is Wrong with Moral Testimony?Robert Hopkins - 2007 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 74 (3):611-634.
Tradition, Friendship and Moral Knowledge.Stephen A. Dinan - 1991 - American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 65 (4):445-464.
Epistemology and Moral Knowledge.Tibor R. Machan - 1982 - Review of Metaphysics 36 (1):23 - 49.
A Defense of Epistemic Authority.Linda Zagzebski - 2013 - Res Philosophica 90 (2):293-306.
What is Wrong With Moral Testimony?Robert Hopkins - 2007 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 74 (3):611-634.
Moral Worth and Moral Knowledge.Paulina Sliwa - 2016 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 93 (2):393-418.
Political Perfectionism and the Moral Acceptability of Pure Paternalism.Adam D. Bailey - 2017 - American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 91 (1):95-112.
Moral Knowledge and “The Argument From Queerness”.Gary Atkinson - 1990 - American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 64 (2):215-232.
Leibniz on Knowledge and God.Christia Mercer - 2002 - American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 76 (4):531-550.
Moral Rules and Particular Circumstances. [REVIEW]S. P. E. - 1972 - Review of Metaphysics 25 (3):551-551.
Naturalism and the Problem of Moral Knowledge.Michael Huemer - 2000 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 38 (4):575-597.
Prospective Medical-Moral Decision Making.Peter J. Cataldo & Elliott Louis Bedford - 2015 - The National Catholic Bioethics Quarterly 15 (1):53-61.
Kant and the Limitations of Legitimized Historical Knowledge.Joseph Palencik - 2012 - International Philosophical Quarterly 52 (4):405-420.


Added to PP index

Total views
12 ( #781,254 of 2,445,398 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #310,973 of 2,445,398 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes