Sophia 41 (2):31-40 (2002)

Authors
Stephen Napier
Villanova University
Abstract
I argue in this paper two theses. First, I argue that the internal consistency of the argument from evil demands that it take into account some form of EST. Thus, there is no ground for the atheist to chide the theist when the theist appeals to an expanded version of theism. Second, I show that it isprima facie probable that RST does in fact ential EST. I show this by capitalizing on the distinction between what is contained in a concept and what is entailed by a concept. What a term or concept means is different from what it may entail. What a concept or term entails is conceptually more robust than what it simply means. I call this the “containment objection” and if is true, then the restricted conjunction rule cannot apply since a version of theism sufficient to deflate the evidential argument would not be logically independent from RST,pace Rowe
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/BF02912234
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 62,363
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Rowe's Evidential Arguments From Evil.Graham Oppy - 2013 - In Justin McBrayer & Daniel Howard-Snyder (eds.), A Companion to the Problem of Evil. Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 49-66.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Skeptical Theism, Abductive Atheology, and Theory Versioning.Timothy Perrine & Stephen J. Wykstra - 2014 - In Trent Dougherty & Justin McBrayer (eds.), Skeptical Theism: New Essays. Oxford University Press..
Surplus Evil.Daniel Howard-Snyder - 1990 - Philosophical Quarterly 40:78-86.
Blocking Rowe's New Evidential Argument From Evil.Jeff Jordan - 2001 - Religious Studies 37 (4):435-449.
Ateism, Agnosticism, and Apothatic Theism.Piotr Sikora - 2010 - Polish Journal of Philosophy 4 (1):65-80.
Skeptical Theism and the Threshold Problem.Yishai A. Cohen - 2013 - Forum Philosophicum: International Journal for Philosophy 18 (1):73-92.
Why Sceptical Theism Isn’T Sceptical Enough.Chris Tucker - 2014 - In Trent Doughtery & Justin McBrayer (eds.), Skeptical Theism: New Essays. Oxford University Press. pp. 45-62.
Pragmatism, Theism, and the Viability of Metaphysical Realism.Michael R. Slater - 2013 - American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 87 (3):379-395.
Erratum To: Paying the Cost of Skeptical Theism. [REVIEW]Jeff A. Snapper - 2011 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 69 (3):233-234.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2013-12-01

Total views
19 ( #558,485 of 2,445,401 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #457,259 of 2,445,401 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes