- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Persons, Moral Worth, and Embryos: A Critical Analysis of Pro-Choice Arguments
Stephen Napier (ed.)
Springer (2011)
Abstract
Given the issues discussed and that the arguments in critical focus are fairly new, the collection provides a novel, comprehensive, and rigorous analysis of contemporary pro-choice arguments.”.Author's Profile
Other Versions
No versions found
Links
PhilArchive
External links
(no proxy)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Through your library
- Sign in / register and customize your OpenURL resolver
- Configure custom resolver
My notes
Similar books and articles
Persons, Moral Worth, and Embryos. A Critical Analysis of Pro-Choice Arguments.Grace Petkovic - 2021 - The New Bioethics 27 (4):371-374.
A Biological Definition of the Human Embryo.Life Begin - 2011 - In Stephen Napier, Persons, Moral Worth, and Embryos: A Critical Analysis of Pro-Choice Arguments. Springer. pp. 111--211.
Abortion and Virtue Ethics.Mathew Lu - 2011 - In Stephen Napier, Persons, Moral Worth, and Embryos: A Critical Analysis of Pro-Choice Arguments. Springer.
Abortion and Soundbites: Why Pro-Choice Arguments Are Harder to Make.Nathan Nobis & Kristina Grob - 2019 - Areo Magazine.
Defending Life: A Moral and Legal Case Against Abortion Choice.Francis J. Beckwith - 2007 - Cambridge University Press.
The Axiology of Abortion: Should We Hope Pro-Choicers or Pro-Lifers are Right?Perry Hendricks - 2021 - Ergo: An Open Access Journal of Philosophy 7.
Der moralische Status menschlicher Embryonen. Pro und contra Spezies-, Kontinuums-, Identitäts- und Potentialitätsargument.Gregor Damschen & Dieter Schönecker (eds.) - 2003 - Berlin & New York: de Gruyter.
A critical examination and development of Wellman’s theory of conductive argument.J. Blair & Dale Hample - unknown
Abortion: Three Perspectives.Michael Tooley, Celia Wolf-Devine, Philip E. Devine & Alison M. Jaggar - 2009 - Oup Usa.
Respecting Fetal Life Within Pro-choice Advocacy: Conceding to Some Pro-life Concerns (and Asking the Same in Return).Bertha Alvarez Manninen - 2023 - Southwest Philosophy Review 39 (1):109-119.
Analytics
Added to PP
2012-02-26
Downloads
331 (#91,588)
6 months
30 (#122,592)
2012-02-26
Downloads
331 (#91,588)
6 months
30 (#122,592)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
Is a Nietzschean Defense of the Christian Valuation of Human Life Tenable?Alexis Deodato Itao - 2024 - Kritike 18 (2):47-66.
Abortion.Jonathan Lewis & Søren Holm - 2017 - In Mortimer Sellers & Stephan Kirste, Encyclopedia of the Philosophy of Law and Social Philosophy. Springer. pp. 1-8.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-54b44b69b7-bbztg uwo