Social Philosophy and Policy 2 (1):33-60 (1984)

Jan Narveson
University of Waterloo
The subject of this essay is political, and therefore social, philosophy; and therefore, ethics. We want to know whether the right thing for a society to do is to incorporate in its structure requirements that we bring about equality, or liberty, or both if they are compatible, and if incompatible then which if either, or what sort of mix if they can to some degree be mixed. But this fairly succinct statement of the issue before us requires considerable clarification, even as a statment of the issue. For it is widely, and in my view correctly, held that some sort of equality is utterly fundamental in these matters. We seek a principle, or principles, that apply to all, are the same for all. In that sense, certainly, equality is fundamental and inescapable. But this is a very thin sort of “equality.” It will almost equally widely be agreed that the principles in question should in some more interesting sense “treat” people equally, e.g., by allotting to all the same set of rights, and moreover, rights that are – again we have to say “in some sense” – nonarbitrary, so that whatever they are, persons of all races, sexes, and so on will have the same fundamental rights assigned to them. Taking this to be, again, essentially uncontroversial, though not without potentially worrisome points of unclarity, it needs, now, to be pointed out that this characterization does not settle the issue that this essay is concerned with. That issue is about economic matters in particular.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1017/S0265052500000893
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 63,360
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Capitalism and the Democratic Economy.Gary A. Dymski & John E. Elliott - 1988 - Social Philosophy and Policy 6 (1):140.
Critical Notice. [REVIEW]Jan Narveson - 1987 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 17 (1):227-234.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Equality Vs. Liberty: Advantage, Liberty.Jan Narveson - 1984 - Social Philosophy and Policy 2 (1):33.
Liberty, Equality, Honor.William Kristol - 1984 - Social Philosophy and Policy 2 (1):125.
Equal Negative Liberty and Welfare Rights.Peter Vallentyne - 2011 - International Journal of Applied Philosophy 25 (2):237-241.
Equal Negative Liberty and Welfare Rights.Peter Vallentyne - 2011 - International Journal of Applied Philosophy 25 (2):237-41.
Equality of What? Why Liberty?Diego Odchimar Iii - 2007 - Philosophia: International Journal of Philosophy (Philippine e-journal) 36 (1).
Narveson on Liberty and Equality.Allan Gibbard - 2011 - International Journal of Applied Philosophy 25 (2):249-258.
Liberty Versus Equal Opportunity*: James S. Fishkin.James S. Fishkin - 1987 - Social Philosophy and Policy 5 (1):32-48.


Added to PP index

Total views
6 ( #1,102,491 of 2,448,876 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #444,630 of 2,448,876 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes