An Eye for an Eye?: The Immorality of Punishing by Death

Rowman & Littlefield Publishers (2001)
Authors
Stephen Nathanson
Johns Hopkins University
Abstract
In the second edition of An Eye for an Eye? Stephen Nathanson evaluates arguments for and against the death penalty, and ultimately defends an abolitionist position to the controversial practice, including arguments that show how and why the death penalty is inconsistent with respect for life and a commitment to justice. A timely new postscript and an updated bibliography accompany the volume
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Buy the book $8.00 new (74% off)   $27.95 direct from Amazon (7% off)    Amazon page
ISBN(s) 9780742513266
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 36,586
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

The Structure of Death Penalty Arguments.Matt Stichter - 2014 - Res Publica 20 (2):129-143.
Contractualism and Punishment.Hon-Lam Li - 2015 - Criminal Justice Ethics 34 (2):177-209.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Death is a Welfare Issue.James W. Yeates - 2010 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 23 (3):229-241.
Death.Shelly Kagan - 2012 - Yale University Press.
Derrida: Opposing Death Penalties.Marguerite La Caze - 2009 - Derrida Today 2 (2):186-199.
Death.James W. Evra - 1984 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 5 (2).
The Death Penalty, in Other Words, Philosophy.Kas Saghafi - 2012 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 50 (s1):136-142.
Whole-Brain Death Reconsidered.A. Browne - 1983 - Journal of Medical Ethics 9 (1):28-44.
In Defense of “Pure” Legal Moralism.Danny Scoccia - 2013 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 7 (3):513-530.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2014-02-06

Total downloads
71 ( #93,384 of 2,303,777 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
15 ( #33,393 of 2,303,777 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature