Naturalism and self-defeat: Plantinga's version

Religious Studies 33 (2):135-142 (1997)
In "Warrant and Proper Function" Plantinga argues that atheistic Naturalism is self-defeating. What is the probability that our cognitive faculties are reliable, given this Naturalism and an evolutionary explanation of their origins? Plantinga argues that if the Naturalist is modest enough to believe that it is irrational to have any belief as to the value of this probability, then he is irrational even to believe his own Naturalism. I suggest that Plantinga's argument has a false premise, and that even if his argument were sound there would be reasons for doubting whether the Naturalist should respond to it by abandoning his Naturalism
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1017/S0034412597003855
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 31,786
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Added to PP index

Total downloads
51 ( #116,181 of 2,231,530 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
8 ( #65,571 of 2,231,530 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature