Res Publica 17 (3):211-225 (2011)
There is an apparent problem in identifying a basis for equality. This problem vanishes if what I call the ‘intuited response’ is successful. According to this response, there is no further explanation of the significance of the feature in virtue of which an individual matters, beyond the bare fact that it is the feature in virtue of which an individual matters. I argue against this claim, and conclude that if the problem of identifying a basis for equality is to be resolved, it is necessary to defend a substantive account of the independent significance of some feature
|Keywords||Equality Egalitarianism Justification Explanation Moral status|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
The Second-Person Standpoint: Morality, Respect, and Accountability.Stephen L. Darwall - 2006 - Harvard University Press.
The Ethics of Killing: Problems at the Margins of Life.Jeff McMahan - 2002 - Oup Usa.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
What Follows From Jacotisme? Exploring Jacques Rancière's Concept of "Declarative" or "Active" Equality.Oliver Davis - unknown
Upside-Down Equality: A Response to Kantian Thought.Prof Laurence Thomas - 2003 - In [Book Chapter] (in Press).
Equality and Inequality in Confucianism.Chenyang Li - 2012 - Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 11 (3):295-313.
Are Freedom and Equality Natural Enemies? A Christian-Theological Perspective.Nico Vorster - 2010 - Heythrop Journal 51 (4):594-609.
The Twilight of the Republic?Jean-Fabien Spitz - 2003 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 6 (1):54-71.
Announcing the Winner of the Holmes Rolston, III Early Career Essay Prize.Emily Brady & Eugene C. Hargrove - 2011 - Environmental Ethics 33 (3):228-228.
Added to index2011-07-18
Total downloads79 ( #64,459 of 2,154,090 )
Recent downloads (6 months)6 ( #119,685 of 2,154,090 )
How can I increase my downloads?