Journal of Research Practice 9 (2):Article M11 (proof) (2013)

Abstract
Science inevitably involves ethical discussions about how research should be implemented. However such discussions often neglect the potential unethical treatment of a third party: the research assistant. Extensive anecdotal evidence suggests that research assistants can experience unique physical, psychological, and social risks when implementing their typical responsibilities. Moreover, these research assistants, who perhaps engage in research experience to bolster their curricula vitae, may feel coerced to continue to work in unsafe environments out of fear of losing rapport with the research supervisor or letters of recommendation for their future endeavors. In the present article, we address two important issues regarding the ethical treatment of research assistants. First, we present evidence suggesting that research assistants may experience substantive risk when implementing their assigned responsibilities. Second, we propose a document, the "Research Assistant's Bill of Rights," as a possible ethics code for people supervising research assistants. This document is independent from typical institutional review board processes, and it has the potential to maximize benefits to research supervisors and research assistants
Keywords research ethics  research training  research policy  research assistantships  research assistant's bill of rights  research supervision  experimenter rights
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 60,021
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

A Confederate's Perspective on Deception.Adam Oliansky - 1991 - Ethics and Behavior 1 (4):253 – 258.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Research Participation as a Contract.Craig Lawson - 1995 - Ethics and Behavior 5 (3):205 – 215.
The Responsible Conduct of Basic and Clinical Research.Andrzej Górski - 2006 - Science and Engineering Ethics 12 (1):3-4.
Honest Research.Dr Harold Hillman - 1995 - Science and Engineering Ethics 1 (1):49-58.
Reflections on My Experience in Human Research Ethics.K. G. Davey - 2009 - Journal of Academic Ethics 7 (1-2):27-31.
Alive and Well: The Research Imperative.Rebecca Dresser - 2012 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 40 (4):915-921.
Research Skills for the Future: A Consultant's Perspective.Richard J. Ormerod - 2013 - Journal of Research Practice 9 (1):Article V2.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2013-11-24

Total views
9 ( #906,828 of 2,433,540 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #468,801 of 2,433,540 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes