Competing Epistemic Spaces

Social Theory and Practice 39 (2):241-264 (2013)
Authors
Mark Christopher Navin
Oakland University
Abstract
Recent increases in the rates of parental refusal of routine childhood vaccination have eroded many countries’ “herd immunity” to communicable diseases. Some parents who refuse routine childhood vaccines do so because they deny the mainstream medical consensus that vaccines are safe and effective. I argue that one reason these vaccine denialists disagree with vaccine proponents about the reasons in favor of vaccination is because they also disagree about the sorts of practices that are conducive to good reasoning about healthcare choices. Vaccine denialists allocate epistemic authority more democratically than do mainstream medical professionals. They also sometimes make truth ascriptions for nonepistemic reasons, fail to recognize legitimate differences in expertiseand competence, and seek uncritical affirmation of their existing beliefs. By focusing on the different epistemic values and practices of vaccine denialists and mainstream medical professionals, I locate my discussion of vaccine denialism within broader debates about rationality. Furthermore, I argue that gender inequality and gendered conceptions of reason are important parts of the explanation of vaccine denialism. Accordingly, I draw upon feminist work—primarily feminist social epistemology—to help explain and evaluate this form of vaccine refusal
Keywords Applied Philosophy  Social and Political Philosophy
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s) 0037-802X  
DOI 10.5840/soctheorpract201339214
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Ethically Compromised Vaccines in Australia.Kerri Anne Brussen - 2012 - Chisholm Health Ethics Bulletin 17 (3):1.
Hiv Preventive Vaccine Research: Selected Ethical Issues.Christine Grady - 1994 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 19 (6):595-612.
The HPV Vaccine Controversy Where Are the Women? Where Are the Men? Where is the Money?Jennifer Caseldine-Bracht - 2010 - International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics 3 (1):99-112.
Should Smallpox Vaccine Be Made Available to the General Public?Thomas May & Ross D. Silverman - 2003 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 13 (2):67-82.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2013-06-12

Total downloads
348 ( #10,714 of 2,263,202 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
34 ( #11,020 of 2,263,202 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature