Sincerity, accuracy and selective conscientious objection

Journal of Military Ethics 12 (2):111 - 128 (2013)
Authors
Mark Christopher Navin
Oakland University
Abstract
Conscientious objectors to military service are either general objectors or selective objectors. The former object to all wars; the latter object to only some wars. There is widespread popular and political support in western liberal democracies for exemptions for general objectors, but currently there is little support for exemptions for selective objectors. Many who advocate exemptions for selective objectors attempt to build upon the strength of support that is enjoyed by exemptions for general objectors. They argue that selective objectors ? like general objectors ? sincerely believe that it would be deeply morally wrong for them to fight in the wars to which they object. I argue that a stronger moral case for exemptions for selective objectors relies upon a different claim: selective objections are often accurate. It is often immoral to fight in the wars to which selective objectors object. While some advocates of exemptions for selective objectors have identified accuracy as a reason for offering exemptions, they have usually not adequately distinguished sincerity from accuracy. However, keeping these two moral reasons for exemptions distinct clarifies and strengthens the moral case for exemptions for selective conscientious objectors
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1080/15027570.2013.818404
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 33,225
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

View all 29 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Unjust War and a Soldier's Moral Dilemma.Jeff Montrose - 2013 - Journal of Military Ethics 12 (4):325-340.
Assembling an Army: Considerations for Just War Theory.Nathan Stout - 2016 - Journal of Global Ethics 12 (2):204-221.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Integrity and Selective Conscientious Objection.Paul Robinson - 2009 - Journal of Military Ethics 8 (1):34-47.
Why Liberal States Must Accommodate Tax Resistors.Jason Brennan - forthcoming - Public Affairs Quarterly.
Selective Conscientious Objection and Gillette Decision.David Malament - 1972 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 1 (4):363-386.
Objecting Morally.C. A. J. Coady - 1997 - The Journal of Ethics 1 (4):375-397.
The Victorian Abortion Law - One Year On.Kevin McGovern - 2009 - Chisholm Health Ethics Bulletin 15 (2):1.
Conscientious Objection and the Morning-After Pill.Corrado Del Bò - 2012 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 29 (2):133-145.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2013-10-19

Total downloads
13 ( #410,230 of 2,242,781 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #410,510 of 2,242,781 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature