Bangladesh Journal of Bioethics 7 (3):23-33 (2016)

Yamikani Ndasauka
University Of Malawi
This paper reflects on the question, Is there a sound justification for the existential view that humans have a higher moral status than other animals? It argues that the existential view that humans have a higher moral status than animals is founded on a weak and inconclusive foundation. While acknowledging various arguments raised for a common foundation between human and non-human animals, the paper attempts to establish a common ground for moral considerability of human and non-human animals. The first common foundation is based on the existential notion of being in the world, which is common for both human and non-human animals. The second idea is based on the common desire to actualize different needs. The paper demonstrates these common foundations by referring to Heidegger and Abraham Maslows hierarchy of needs.
Keywords Animal rights, existentialism, needs, bioethics, moral consideration
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.3329/bioethics.v7i3.30952
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 58,744
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Oneself as Another.Frederick A. Olafson - 1997 - International Studies in Philosophy 29 (4):137-138.
Oneself as Another.Kathleen Blamey (ed.) - 1995 - University of Chicago Press.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

The Moral Considerability of Invasive Transgenic Animals.Benjamin Hale - 2006 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 19 (4):337-366.
Moral Agency in Other Animals.Paul Shapiro - 2006 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 27 (4):357-373.
The Moral Status of Animals.Scott David Wilson - 2002 - Dissertation, University of California, Santa Barbara
Speciesism and Moral Status.Peter Singer - 2009 - Metaphilosophy 40 (3-4):567-581.
Comparing Lives: Rush Rhees on Humans and Animals.Matthew Pianalto - 2011 - Philosophical Investigations 34 (3):287-311.
The Mere Considerability of Animals.Mylan Engel Jr - 2001 - Acta Analytica 16:89-108.
Justification of Animal Rights Claim.Azam Golam - 2009 - Philosophy and Progress 43 (2):139-152.
The Moral Rights of Animals.Mylan Engel & Gary Lynn Comstock (eds.) - 2016 - Lanham, MD: Lexington.
Why the Concept of Moral Status Should Be Abandoned.Oscar Horta - 2017 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 20 (4):899-910.


Added to PP index

Total views
11 ( #806,551 of 2,425,259 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #352,133 of 2,425,259 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes