Science and Engineering Ethics 13 (1):5-24 (2007)

Abstract
The purpose of this study was to identify and describe published research articles that were named in official findings of scientific misconduct and to investigate compliance with the administrative actions contained in these reports for corrections and retractions, as represented in PubMed. Between 1993 and 2001, 102 articles were named in either the NIH Guide for Grants and Contracts (“Findings of Scientific Misconduct”) or the U.S. Office of Research Integrity annual reports as needing retraction or correction. In 2002, 98 of the 102 articles were indexed in PubMed. Eighty-five of these 98 articles had indexed corrections: 47 were retracted; 26 had an erratum; 12 had a correction described in the “comment” field. Thirteen had no correction, but 10 were linked to the NIH Guide “Findings of Scientific Misconduct”, leaving only 3 articles with no indication of any sort of problem. As of May 2005, there were 5,393 citations to the 102 articles, with a median of 26 citations per article (range 0–592). Researchers should be alert to “Comments” linked to the NIH Guide as these are open access, and the “Findings of Scientific Misconduct’ reports are often more informative than the statements about the retraction or correction found in the journals.
Keywords Bibliometric analysis  Biomedical publishing  Publication ethics  Scientific misconduct  Retraction of publication
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s11948-006-0003-1
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 60,826
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

International Science and Fair-Play Practices.Pieter J. D. Drenth - 2002 - Science and Engineering Ethics 8 (1):5-11.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

The Sociological Determinants of Scientific Bias.Joseph H. Michalski - forthcoming - Journal of Moral Education:1-14.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Misconduct in Science and the German Law.Stefanic Stegemann-Bochl - 2000 - Science and Engineering Ethics 6 (1):57-62.
Scientific Misconduct: Present Problems and Future Trends.Barbara Mishkin - 1999 - Science and Engineering Ethics 5 (2):283-292.
Responsible Conduct in Research.P. J. D. Drenth - 2006 - Science and Engineering Ethics 12 (1):13-21.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
27 ( #396,689 of 2,438,854 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #435,061 of 2,438,854 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes