A Counterexample to Parfit's Rule Consequentialism

Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy 6 (2):1-10 (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Derek Parfit argues that everyone ought to follow the principles whose universal acceptance would make things go best. I present a counterexample: a world in which no one's moral beliefs have any motivating force. I explain how Parfit's metaethical commitments imply that such a world is possible, and why this possibility is a problem for Parfit's project of reconciling Kantianism, contractualism, and consequentialism. I consider two of Parfit's responses to my counterexample.

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2012-07-18

Downloads
2,638 (#2,838)

6 months
201 (#12,246)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Jake Nebel
Princeton University

Citations of this work

Rule-consequentialism.Brad Hooker - 1990 - Mind 99 (393):67-77.
Parfit, Convergence, and Underdetermination.Marius Baumann - 2018 - Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy 13 (3).

Add more citations

References found in this work

The Pragmatics of Moral Motivation.Caj Strandberg - 2011 - The Journal of Ethics 15 (4):341-369.
The externalist and the amoralist.James Lenman - 1999 - Philosophia 27 (3-4):441-457.
The challenge of communal internalism.Jon Tresan - 2009 - Journal of Value Inquiry 43 (2):179-199.
Internalists Beware—we Might all be Amoralists!Gunnar Björnsson & Ragnar Francén Olinder - 2013 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 91 (1):1-14.

View all 7 references / Add more references