Teaching Philosophy through Lincoln-Douglas Debate

Teaching Philosophy 36 (3):271-289 (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper is about teaching philosophy to high school students through Lincoln-Douglas (LD) debate. LD, also known as “values debate,” includes topics from ethics and political philosophy. Thousands of high school students across the U.S. debate these topics in class, after school, and at weekend tournaments. We argue that LD is a particularly effective tool for teaching philosophy, but also that LD today falls short of its potential. We argue that the problems with LD are not inevitable, and we offer strategic recommendations for improving LD as a tool for teaching philosophy. Ultimately, our aim is to create a dialogue between LD and academic philosophy, with the hope that such dialogue will improve LD’s capacity to teach students how to do philosophy.

Similar books and articles

Building a High School Philosophy Program.Sean A. Riley - 2013 - Teaching Philosophy 36 (3):239-252.
Socrates in Homeroom.James R. Davis - 2013 - Teaching Philosophy 36 (3):217-238.
Logic for the LSAT.Nancy Slonneger Hancock - 2006 - Teaching Philosophy 29 (2):125-155.
Teaching Law in Medical Schools: First, Reflect.Amy T. Campbell - 2012 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 40 (2):301-310.
Ethics Tour 2007.Brian Domino - 2008 - Teaching Philosophy 31 (3):249-253.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-09-04

Downloads
2,938 (#2,513)

6 months
482 (#3,306)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Peter van Elswyk
Northwestern University
Jake Nebel
Princeton University
Ryan Harter
Centenary College of Louisiana
1 more

References found in this work

Famine, Affluence, and Morality.Peter Singer - 1972 - Oxford University Press USA.
Famine, affluence, and morality.Peter Singer - 1972 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 1 (3):229-243.
Law’s Empire.Ronald Dworkin - 1986 - Harvard University Press.

View all 29 references / Add more references