An Aristotelian theory of chemical substance

History of Philosophy & Logical Analysis 12:149-164 (2009)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper traces the principal thematic developments in Aristotle’s conception of chemical substance as they bear on the evolution of the notion into modern times. A line of speculation is indicated about the interpretation of elemental proportions clearly raised by Aristotle’s discussion but not pursued in his extant writings. Apart from its historical interest, Aristotle’s discussion of substance and mixture has been taken up in contemporary systematic philosophy (Fine 1995), where it is treated as at best only relevant to ordinary, everyday views. This approach gains support from the contention that such views have been superseded by the molecular conception of chemical substance developed in 19th century science and extolled by advocates of the Kripke-Putnam conception of microessentialism (Kripke 1980, Putnam 1975). Duhem (1902), who well understood what would now be called the macroscopic theory of thermodynamics and its relevance to chemistry, had a different view, and the present discussion is much influenced by him. Certainly, Aristotle’s view stands in need of modification in the light of the understanding of mixtures provided by Gibbs’ phase rule (Gibbs 1948). But with a certain weakening, a central Aristotelian claim about mixtures still has some bearing.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Resisting Chemical Atomism: Duhem’s Argument.Paul Needham - 2008 - Philosophy of Science 75 (5):921-931.
The epistemological status of the chemical concept of element (I).F. A. Paneth - 1962 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 13 (49):1-14.
Thomas Kuhn and the chemical revolution.Paul Hoyningen-Huene - 2008 - Foundations of Chemistry 10 (2):101-115.
Hume on the cartesian theory of substance.Daniel E. Flage & Ronald J. Glass - 1984 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 22 (4):497-508.
The Language of Being and the Nature of God in the Aristotelian Tradition.R. E. Houser - 2010 - Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 84:113-132.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-01-16

Downloads
60 (#262,432)

6 months
16 (#148,627)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Paul Needham
Stockholm University

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references