Acm Sigcas Computers and Society 47 (3):98-111 (2017)

Authors
Erica Neely
Ohio Northern University
Abstract
As video games flourish, designers have a responsibility to treat players and potential players justly. In deontological terms, designers are obliged to treat all of them as having intrinsic worth. Since players are a diverse group, designers must not simply focus on an idealized gamer, who is typically a straight white male. This creates a duty to consider whether design choices place unnecessary barriers to the ability of certain groups of players to achieve their ends in playing a game. I examine the design implication of this for the gameworld, avatar design, and accessibility to players with disabilities. I also consider the limits of designers' control by examining responses to abusive player chat in multiplayer games. Ultimately, a careful balance must be found between what is necessary to create the game a designer envisions and what is necessary for treating all players as having intrinsic worth.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1145/3144592.3144602
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 64,262
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

More on the Pressing Down Game.Jakob Kellner & Saharon Shelah - 2011 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 50 (3-4):477-501.
Divide-the-Dollar Game Revisited.Nejat Anbarci - 2001 - Theory and Decision 50 (4):295-303.
Omniscience and Omnipotence: How They May Help - or Hurt - in a Game.Steven J. Brams - 1982 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 25 (2):217 – 231.
Games with Zero-Knowledge Signaling.Edward Epsen - 2007 - Studia Logica 86 (3):403-414.
Who Gains From Information Asymmetry?Gil S. Epstein & Yosef Mealem - 2013 - Theory and Decision 75 (3):305-337.
Shooting with Confidence.Kevin Kinghorn - 2007 - In Jerry Walls & Gregory Bassham (eds.), Basketball and Philosophy. University Press of Kentucky. pp. 185-195.
Where the Sum of Our Expectation Fails Us: The Exchange Paradox.John Norton - 1998 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 79 (1):34-58.
Where the Sum of Our Expectation Fails Us: The Exchange Paradox.Norton John - 1998 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 79 (1):34–58.
What's My Motivation? Video Games and Interpretative Performance.Grant Tavinor - 2017 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 75 (1):23-33.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2017-10-25

Total views
4 ( #1,252,053 of 2,455,641 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #449,205 of 2,455,641 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes