Collective harm and the inefficacy problem

Philosophy Compass 14 (4):e12587 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper discusses the inefficacy problem that arises in contexts of “collective harm.‘ These are contexts in which by acting in a certain sort of way, people collectively cause harm, or fail to prevent it, but no individual act of the relevant sort seems to itself make a difference. The inefficacy problem is that if acting in the relevant way won’t make a difference, it’s unclear why it would be wrong. Each individual can argue, “things will be just as bad whether or not I act in this way, so there’s no point in doing otherwise.‘ The goal of this paper is to give an overview of some of the main responses available to the problem and to highlight central issues that arise for each type of response. In the final section, I explain what I take to be the most promising strategy and discuss the form that this strategy should take.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 97,060

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The psychological basis of collective action.James Fanciullo - 2021 - Philosophical Studies 178 (2):427-444.
What is the point of helping?James Fanciullo - 2020 - Philosophical Studies 177 (6):1487-1500.
How you can help, without making a difference.Julia Nefsky - 2017 - Philosophical Studies 174 (11):2743-2767.
The Problem of Collective Harm: A Threshold Solution.Frank Hindriks - 2024 - Erasmus Journal for Philosophy and Economics 17 (1):aa-aa.
Climate Change, Individual Emissions, and Foreseeing Harm.Chad Vance - 2017 - Journal of Moral Philosophy 14 (5):562-584.
Consumer Complicity and the Problem of Individual Causal Efficacy.Corey Katz - 2023 - Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy 24 (2).
Consumer Choice and Collective Impact.Julia Nefsky - 2017 - In Anne Barnhill, Mark Budolfson & Tyler Doggett (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Food Ethics. Oxford University Press. pp. 267-286.
Participation and Superfluity.Jan Willem Wieland & Rutger van Oeveren - 2020 - Journal of Moral Philosophy 17 (2):163-187.

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-04-26

Downloads
646 (#32,649)

6 months
98 (#69,955)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Julia Nefsky
University of Toronto at Scarborough

Citations of this work

Collective responsibility for climate change.Säde Hormio - 2023 - WIREs Climate Change 14 (4).
Counting Your Chickens.Yoaav Isaacs, Adam Lerner & Jeffrey Sanford Russell - 2024 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 102 (3):675-692.
Indeterminacy and impotence.Benjamin Hale - 2022 - Synthese 200 (3):1-24.

View all 41 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

Reasons and Persons.Joseph Margolis - 1986 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 47 (2):311-327.
What We Owe to Each Other.Thomas Scanlon (ed.) - 1998 - Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
It's Not My Fault: Global Warming and Individual Moral Obligations.Walter Sinnott-Armstrong - 2005 - In Walter Sinnott-Armstrong & Richard B. Howarth (eds.), Perspectives on Climate Change. Elsevier. pp. 221–253.
What’s Wrong with Joyguzzling?Ewan Kingston & Walter Sinnott-Armstrong - 2018 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 21 (1):169-186.

View all 74 references / Add more references