The properties of stimuli associated with shock reduction

Journal of Experimental Psychology 53 (3):184 (1957)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1037/h0047427

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,202

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Shock strength, shock reduction, and running speed.John P. Seward, Richard A. Shea, Arthur A. Uyeda & David C. Raskin - 1960 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 60 (4):250.
Escape learning as a function of amount of shock reduction.G. H. Bower, H. Fowler & M. A. Trapold - 1959 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 58 (6):482.
Preference-for-signaled-shock phenomenon: Effects of shock modifiability and light reinforcement.Gerald B. Biederman & John J. Furedy - 1973 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 100 (2):380.
Acquisition of secondary reward by cues associated with shock reduction.Maurice P. Smith & Garth Buchanan - 1954 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 48 (2):123.
Secondary reinforcement and shock termination.Robert A. Kinsman & V. Edwin Bixenstine - 1968 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 76 (1p1):62.
The reinforcement difference limen (RDL) function for shock reduction.Byron A. Campbell - 1956 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 52 (4):258.
Preconditioning the effects of shock-correlated reinforcement.John G. Carlson - 1974 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 103 (3):409.
The effect of reversal shifts and scrambled shock on preference for signaled shock established with unscrambled shock.Brian M. Kruger, Patrick E. Campbell & Mark S. Crabtree - 1981 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 17 (2):113-116.
The effect of shock on the rat's choice of a path to food.Thomas F. Lohr - 1959 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 58 (4):312.
Factors affecting preference for signal-shock over shock-signal.Charles C. Perkins Jr, Richard G. Seymann, Donald J. Levis & H. Randolph Spencer Jr - 1966 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 72 (2):190.
Temporal form of shock is a determinant of magnitude of interference with escape-avoidance learning produced by exposure to inescapable shock.Charles R. Crowell, J. Victor Lupo, Christopher L. Cunningham & D. Chris Anderson - 1978 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 12 (6):407-410.
Failure to escape shock following repeated exposure to inescapable shock.Robert A. Rosellini & Martin E. P. Seligman - 1976 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 7 (3):251-253.
Reinforcement difference limen (RDL) for delay in shock escape.Roger M. Tarpy - 1969 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 79 (1p1):116.
Immediate vs. delayed shock in T-maze performance.Robert K. Knapp, Richard H. Kause & Charles C. Perkins - 1959 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 58 (5):357.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-22

Downloads
13 (#973,701)

6 months
8 (#283,518)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references