Modelling competing legal arguments using Bayesian model comparison and averaging

Artificial Intelligence and Law 27 (4):403-430 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Bayesian models of legal arguments generally aim to produce a single integrated model, combining each of the legal arguments under consideration. This combined approach implicitly assumes that variables and their relationships can be represented without any contradiction or misalignment, and in a way that makes sense with respect to the competing argument narratives. This paper describes a novel approach to compare and ‘average’ Bayesian models of legal arguments that have been built independently and with no attempt to make them consistent in terms of variables, causal assumptions or parameterization. The approach involves assessing whether competing models of legal arguments are explained or predict facts uncovered before or during the trial process. Those models that are more heavily disconfirmed by the facts are given lower weight, as model plausibility measures, in the Bayesian model comparison and averaging framework adopted. In this way a plurality of arguments is allowed yet a single judgement based on all arguments is possible and rational.

Other Versions

No versions found

Similar books and articles

A Bayesian model of legal syllogistic reasoning.Axel Constant - 2024 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 32 (2):441-462.
Combining argumentation and bayesian nets for breast cancer prognosis.Matt Williams & Jon Williamson - 2006 - Journal of Logic, Language and Information 15 (1):155-178.
Proof with and without probabilities.Bart Verheij - 2017 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 25 (1):127-154.
Arguments from Expert Opinion – An Epistemological Approach.Christoph Lumer - 2020 - In Catarina Dutilh Novaes, Henrike Jansen, Jan Albert Van Laar & Bart Verheij (eds.), Reason to Dissent. Proceedings of the 3rd European Conference on Argumentation. College Publications. pp. 403-422.

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-03-28

Downloads
446 (#64,809)

6 months
105 (#56,823)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Citations of this work

A Bayesian model of legal syllogistic reasoning.Axel Constant - 2024 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 32 (2):441-462.
Measuring coherence with Bayesian networks.Alicja Kowalewska & Rafal Urbaniak - 2023 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 31 (2):369-395.
The Limits of Bayesian Thinking in Court.Ronald Meester - 2020 - Topics in Cognitive Science 12 (4):1205-1212.

Add more citations