British Journal of Aesthetics 52 (2):141-151 (2012)

Authors
Aaron Ridley
University of Southampton
Abstract
Relational theories of art—paradigmatically, the ‘Institutional’ theory—arose from dissatisfaction with the Wittgenstein-inspired ‘family resemblance’ account of art, and were taken not merely to be preferable in various ways to that account, but actually to falsify it. We argue that this latter thought is rooted in a fundamental misunderstanding of the falsification-conditions of a family resemblance account; and we suggest that, once the reasons for this are appreciated, any apparent motivation to engage in relational theorizing about art evaporates.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1093/aesthj/ays004
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 53,617
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Las Normas Y Su Puesta En Vigor: Respuesta a Josep Corbí.Manuel García-Carpintero - 2017 - Crítica. Revista Hispanoamericana de Filosofía 49 (145):113-132.
Anti-Anti-Essentialism About Art.Daniel Patrick Wilson - 2015 - American Society for Aesthetics Graduate E-Journal 7 (2).

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

On the Cluster Account of Art.Thomas Adajian - 2003 - British Journal of Aesthetics 43 (4):379-385.
Family Resemblances, Relationalism, and the Meaning of 'Art'.Daniel A. Kaufman - 2007 - British Journal of Aesthetics 47 (3):280-297.
Relational Complexes.Joop Leo - 2013 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 42 (2):357-390.
Failed-Art and Failed Art-Theory.Christy Mag Uidhir - 2010 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 88 (3):381-400.
Theories of Art.Moshe Barasch - 1985 - Routledge.
Models as Make-Believe.Adam Toon - 2010 - In Roman Frigg & Matthew Hunter (eds.), Beyond Mimesis and Convention: Representation in Art and Science. Boston Studies in Philosophy of Science.
Art and its History.Risto Pitkänen - 2010 - Nordic Journal of Aesthetics 21 (39).
Modern Theories of Art.Moshe Barasch - 1990 - New York University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2012-03-15

Total views
44 ( #218,667 of 2,348,760 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #512,546 of 2,348,760 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes