Lutheránský aristotelismus – Philipp Melanchthon

Studia Neoaristotelica 2 (1):67-82 (2005)
De philosophia Aristotelico-Lutherana apud Philippum MelanchthonemIn hac dissertatione elementa principalia relationis Philippi Melanchthonis ad philosophiam Aristotelicam in dialectica, ethica et philosophia naturali summatimexponuntur. Quamquam Melanchthon iuvenili aetate renascentis aevi virorum doctorum mentem de litteris Graecis-Latinisque ad pristinam puritatem restaurandis secutus est, tamen doctrina eius Aristotelica nullo modo „pura“ putanda est. Imprimis eius de „notiis naturalibus“ opinio, quae magnam vim ad eius dialecticam, ethicam, de cognitione doctrinam habuit, Aristotelica haud dicenda est et Platonis potius auctoritatem redolet. Finis, quem Philippi Melanchthonis philosophia Aristotelica recipienda prosecutus est, imprimis Lutheranismi et apologia et propagatio esse videntur. Ita dialectica et rhetorica, quam praebet, exegesi Sacrae Scripturae quasi unice inservire debebant. Simili ratione ductus Melachthon medii aevi theologorum de felicitate opinionem reiecit, et anthropologiam (quam dicunt) in Legis et Evangelii dialecticam collocabat. Idem eius naturalis philosophia, quae fere tota Dei providentiae declarandae vota est, innuit. Quoniam Malanchthonis Aristotelicae docrinae receptio adeo a principiis theologicis M. Lutheri pendet, Aristotelico-Lutherana apte nuncupanda videtur.Lutheran Aristotelianism – Philipp MelanchthonThis article summarises the basic features of Melanchthon’s approach to Aristotle’s philosophy in the areas of logic, ethics and natural philosophy. Although Melanchthon builds upon the humanistic ideal of purifying classical heritage, his Aristotelianism should not be viewed as ‘pure’. His conception of natural knowledge (notitiae naturales) could be regarded as a significant non-Aristotelian element of his philosophy. The view consequently penetrates his logic, ethics as well as epistemology. Primarily, however, the reason behind his reception of Aristotle is a defence of Luther’s views: the aims of logic and rhetoric lie in theexegesis of the Bible within the context of the principle of ‘ Sola Scriptura’; he rejects the medieval concept of felicity and puts antropology into the dialectics of Law and Gospel; the aim of natural philosophy is the exposition of the existence of God’s Providence. Melanchthon’s reception of Aristotle is thus influenced by the theology of the Reformation to such an extent, that we might refer to it as Lutheran Aristotelianism
Keywords Catholic Tradition  History of Philosophy  Philosophy and Religion
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s) 1214-8407
DOI 10.5840/studneoar20052120
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Translate to english
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 30,694
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Philipp Melanchthon (1497-1560) : Reformer and Philosopher.Günter Frank - 2010 - In Paul Richard Blum (ed.), Philosophers of the Renaissance. Catholic University of America Press.
Univerzální preskriptivismus R. M. Hara.Petr Dvořák - 2006 - Studia Neoaristotelica 3 (1):56-61.
Captivity or Autonomy? Philipp Melanchthon's Theological Anthropology.Gregory B. Graybill - 2011 - Inquiry : An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 54 (5):460 - 477.
The Transformation of Natural Philosophy: The Case of Philip Melanchthon.Peter Robert Dear - 1997 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 35 (3):463-465.
Suárez and Descartes.Helen Hattab - 2011 - Studia Neoaristotelica 8 (2):143-162.
Philip Melanchthon's Correspondence. Red - 1977 - Philosophy and History 10 (1):31-36.
Aristotelian and Cartesian Logic at Harvard: Charles Morton's a Logick System & William Brattle's Compendium of Logick.Charles Morton - 1995 - Published by the Colonial Society of Massachusetts and Distributed by the University Press of Virginia.
Erasmus and Melanchthon.Wilhelm Schenk - 1967 - Heythrop Journal 8 (3):249–259.
Added to PP index

Total downloads
22 ( #235,178 of 2,197,231 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #298,964 of 2,197,231 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature