A Defense of Environmental Ethics: A Reply to Janna Thompson

Environmental Ethics 15 (3):245-257 (1993)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Janna Thompson dismisses environmental ethics primarily because it does not meet her criteria for ethics: consistency, non-vacuity, and decidability. In place of a more expansive environmental ethic, she proposes to limit moral considerability to beings with a “point of view.” I contend, first, that a point-of-view centered ethic is unacceptable not only because it fails to meet the tests of her own and other criteria,but also because it is precisely the type of ethic that has contributed to our current environmental dilemmas. Second, I argue that the holistic, ecocentric land ethic of Aldo Leopold, as developed by J. Baird Callicott, an environmental ethic that Thompson never considers, nicely meets Thompson’s criteria for acceptable ethics, and may indeed be the cure for our environmental woes.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 107,286

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
60 (#406,988)

6 months
3 (#1,291,427)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

The Virtue of Environmental Creativity.Jason Matteson - 2013 - Environmental Values 22 (6):703-723.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references