Hurts, insults and stigmas: a comment on Murphy

Journal of Medical Ethics 37 (2):66-67 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Both of the main points in Professor Murphy's paper seem to me clearly and effectively argued.1 It is incontrovertible that some people find hurtful the use of medical technologies to avoid the birth of children who, in the present order of things, would be disabled. No result from the philosophy of language, or anywhere else for that matter, can plausibly show otherwise. Indeed, even to speak of ‘legitimately interpreting’ events that cause one pain as ‘hurtful’, as Murphy does, seems a shade too conciliatory to any who has the temerity to doubt this matter: typically, at least, I don't interpret a state of affairs as hurtful. I experience it so—or not.He's quite right to point out as well that the fact that someone's actions cause another to feel hurt does not, on its own, imply much of anything about the action's propriety. There are many serious people who are deeply distressed by others' reproductive choices that have nothing to do with disability: terminating a pregnancy for any reason causes some people considerable pain. Yet there seems no reason whatever to regard that pain, considered on its own, as a reason that—at least in general terms—should bear on a person's decision concerning whether or not to give birth to the fetus that she is gestating.Expressivist arguments, so understood, then, seem to have had their measure taken. If anyone had the temerity to think that no one is hurt by choices to avoid or end pregnancies because they might lead to the birth of a child who would be disabled, they can drop that thought right now. On the other hand, if someone thought that the hurt suffered by such people constitutes a serious reason for restricting what others can find out about their potential or actual pregnancies, or …

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 90,221

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Insults, Free Speech and Offensiveness.David Archard - 2013 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 31 (2):127-141.
A comment on Peirce's "tychism".Francis Murphy Hamblin - 1945 - Journal of Philosophy 42 (14):378-383.
Insults, side-taking and shouting.Ophelia Benson - 2012 - The Philosophers' Magazine 59 (59):23-24.
9 Knowing It Hurts.Fred Dretske - 2010 - In Joseph Keim Campbell, Michael O.’Rourke & Harry S. Silverstein (eds.), Knowledge and Skepticism. MIT Press. pp. 203.
Overkill, or History that Hurts.Jeffrey F. Hamburger - 2007 - Common Knowledge 13 (2-3):404-428.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-22

Downloads
30 (#456,882)

6 months
2 (#658,848)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Jamie Nelson
Michigan State University

Citations of this work

Reconciling the disability critique and reproductive liberty: The case of negative genetic selection.Melinda C. Hall - 2013 - International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics 6 (1):121-143.
Reconciling the Disability Critique and Reproductive Liberty: The Case of Negative Genetic Selection.Melinda C. Hall - 2013 - International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics 6 (1):121-143.

Add more citations

References found in this work

When choosing the traits of children is hurtful to others.Timothy Murphy - 2011 - Journal of Medical Ethics 37 (2):105-108.
Synecdoche and Stigma.James Lindemann Nelson - 2007 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 16 (4):475.

Add more references