Naturalistic Ethics and the Argument from Evil

Faith and Philosophy 8 (3):368-379 (1991)
Philosophical naturalism is a cluster of views and impulses typically taken to include atheism, physicalism, radical empiricism or naturalized epistemology, and some sort of relativism, subjectivism or nihilism about morality. I argue that a problem arises when the naturalist offers the argument from evil for atheism. Since the argument from evil is a moral argument, it cannot be effectively deployed by anyone who holds the denatured ethical theories that the naturalist typically holds. In the context of these naturalistic ethical theories, the argument from evil typically fails to provide good reason for either the naturalist or the theist to disbelieve in the God of theism. This does not prove that naturalism is false, or that the argument from evil is unsound, but rather that certain naturalists’ use of the argument has been misguided
Keywords argument from evil  atheism  naturalism  metaethics  relativism  subjectivism  nihilism
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.5840/faithphil19918329
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 29,174
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
The Nihilistic Consequences of the Argument From Evil.Robert Lehe - 2009 - International Philosophical Quarterly 49 (4):427-437.
God, Evil, and Suffering.Daniel Howard-Snyder - 1999 - In Michael Murray (ed.), Reason for the Hope Within. Eerdmans. pp. 217--237.
The Problem of Evil and the Attributes of God.James A. Keller - 1989 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 26 (3):155 - 171.
The Evidential Argument From Evil.Daniel Howard-Snyder (ed.) - 1996 - Indiana University Press.
Evidential Arguments From Evil.Richard Otte - 2000 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 48 (1):1-10.
Why Only Perfection Is Good Enough.Nicholas Everitt - 2000 - Philosophical Papers 29 (3):155-158.
Surplus Evil.Daniel Howard-Snyder - 1990 - Philosophical Quarterly 40:78-86.
Added to PP index

Total downloads
52 ( #102,371 of 2,180,087 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
4 ( #68,788 of 2,180,087 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature

There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums