Public views about quality of life and treatment withdrawal in infants: limitations and directions for future research

Journal of Medical Ethics 46 (1):20-21 (2020)

Authors
Ryan H. Nelson
Baylor College of Medicine
Abstract
Work done within the realm of what is sometimes called ‘descriptive ethics’ brings two questions readily to mind: How can empirical findings, in general, inform normative debates? and How can these empirical findings, in particular, inform the normative debate at hand? Brick et al 1 confront these questions in their novel investigation of public views about lives worth living and the permissibility of withdrawing life-sustaining treatment from critically ill infants. Mindful of the is-ought gap, the authors suggest modestly that their data ‘may be useful when constructing guidelines for clinical practice’. In this commentary, I consider some potential limitations on the generalisability of these data in the context of policy and clinical practice, limitations which may in turn serve as directions for future empirical research. The authors’ study presented participants six case scenarios, five of which involved the possibility of withdrawing life-sustaining treatment from critically ill infants. The results revealed that “[a]lmost all respondents agreed that at some level of quality of life, life may be of no benefit or worse than death for an infant” and that “participants significantly favoured withdrawal of treatment for the most severe cases.” One salient detail in these scenarios …
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1136/medethics-2019-105836
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 47,299
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

The Concise Argument.Lucy Frith - 2020 - Journal of Medical Ethics 46 (1):1-2.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

'Quality of Life' and the Analogy with the Nazis.Cynthia B. Cohen - 1983 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 8 (2):113-136.
Quality of Life - Three Competing Views.Peter Sondøe - 1999 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 2 (1):11-23.
If You Ask the Wrong Question, You'll Get the Wrong Answer.C. Foster - 2013 - Journal of Medical Ethics 39 (9):578-578.
Can Infants Have Interests in Continued Life?Chris Kaposy - 2007 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 28 (4):301-330.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2019-11-03

Total views
4 ( #1,148,562 of 2,290,948 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
4 ( #304,811 of 2,290,948 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature