Authors
Eric S. Nelson
Hong Kong University of Science and Technology
Abstract
This paper is about the relevance of the ineffable and the singular to hermeneutics. I respond to standard criticisms of Friedrich Schleiermacher by Karl Barth and Hans-Georg Gadamer in order to clarify his understanding of language, interpretation, and religion. Schleiermacher’s “indicative hermeneutics” is developed in the context of the ethical significance of communication and the ineffable. The notion of trace is employed in order to interpret the paradox of speaking about that which cannot be spoken. The trace is not a brute singularity but bears a fundamental relationship to the word—and ultimately the word of God—for Schleiermacher
Keywords Ancient Philosophy  Continental Philosophy  History of Philosophy
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s) 1085-1968
DOI 10.5840/epoche2004823
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2011-01-06

Total views
230 ( #36,447 of 2,362,050 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
54 ( #12,564 of 2,362,050 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes