Universality Revisited

Emotion Review 5 (1):8-15 (2013)

Authors
James Russell
Trent University
Abstract
Evidence does not support the claim that observers universally recognize basic emotions from signals on the face. The percentage of observers who matched the face with the predicted emotion (matching score) is not universal, but varies with culture and language. Matching scores are also inflated by the commonly used methods: within-subject design; posed, exaggerated facial expressions (devoid of context); multiple examples of each type of expression; and a response format that funnels a variety of interpretations into one word specified by the experimenter. Without these methodological aids, matching scores are modest and subject to various explanations
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1177/1754073912457227
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 46,282
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

View all 7 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

View all 23 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2013-11-02

Total views
13 ( #654,188 of 2,285,981 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
4 ( #319,978 of 2,285,981 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature