Y and Z Are Not Off the Hook: The Survival Lottery Made Fairer

Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 35 (4):396-401 (2010)
In this article I show that the argument in John Harris's famous "Survival Lottery" paper cannot be right. Even if we grant Harris's assumptions—of the justifiability of such a lottery, the correctness of maximizing consequentialism, the indistinguishability between killing and letting die, the practical and political feasibility of such a scheme—the argument still will not yield the conclusion that Harris wants. On his own terms, the medically needy should be less favored (and more vulnerable to being killed), than Harris suggests
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1093/jmp/jhq030
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
Download options
PhilPapers Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 24,392
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
John Harris (1975). The Survival Lottery. Philosophy 50 (191):81 - 87.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
J. A. Bulcock (2010). Introduction. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 35 (4):383-395.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

63 ( #77,425 of 1,924,709 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

1 ( #417,761 of 1,924,709 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

Start a new thread
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.