Child's play

Philosophy of Science 63 (4):542-546 (1996)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Although most philosophers are not aware of it, research in cognitive development and in learning in the last decade has made considerable use of the characterizations of the nature and development of scientific knowledge proffered by philosophers of science. In a “reflexive” move, Alison Gopnik proposes philosophers of science can profit from the research of psychologists investigating cognitive development-specifically from that group of researchers who advocate the “theory theory.”

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
38 (#410,745)

6 months
15 (#159,128)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Nancy Nersessian
Georgia Institute of Technology

References found in this work

How do Scientists Think? Capturing the Dynamics of Conceptual Change in Science.Nancy Nersessian - 1992 - In R. Giere & H. Feigl (eds.), Cognitive Models of Science. University of Minnesota Press. pp. 3--45.
Should physicists preach what they practice?Nancy J. Nersessian - 1995 - Science & Education 4 (3):203-226.
The Copycat Project.Douglas Hofstadter & Melanie Mitchell - 1995 - In Fluid Concepts and Creative Analogies.

Add more references