Creating Scientific Concepts
MIT Press (2008)
Abstract
How do novel scientific concepts arise? In Creating Scientific Concepts, Nancy Nersessian seeks to answer this central but virtually unasked question in the problem of conceptual change. She argues that the popular image of novel concepts and profound insight bursting forth in a blinding flash of inspiration is mistaken. Instead, novel concepts are shown to arise out of the interplay of three factors: an attempt to solve specific problems; the use of conceptual, analytical, and material resources provided by the cognitive-social-cultural context of the problem; and dynamic processes of reasoning that extend ordinary cognition. Focusing on the third factor, Nersessian draws on cognitive science research and historical accounts of scientific practices to show how scientific and ordinary cognition lie on a continuum, and how problem-solving practices in one illuminate practices in the other.Author's Profile
Reprint years
2010
ISBN(s)
9780262515078 0262515075 0262141051
My notes
Similar books and articles
Reasoning from Imagery and Analogy in Scientific Concept Formation.Nancy J. Nersessian - 1988 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1988:41 - 47.
Developmental issues in model-based reasoning during childhood.Patricia H. Miller - 2001 - Mind and Society 2 (2):49-58.
Visual models in analogical problem solving.Jim Davies, Nancy J. Nersessian & Ashok K. Goel - 2005 - Foundations of Science 10 (1):133-152.
Model‐Based Reasoning in Distributed Cognitive Systems.Nancy J. Nersessian - 2006 - Philosophy of Science 73 (5):699-709.
MODEL-BASED REASONING IN SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY.Lorenzo Magnani, Walter Carnielli & Claudio Pizzi (eds.) - 2010 - Springer.
Concept Formation and Linguistic Meaning in Science and Theology.Garey Britton Spradley - 1990 - Dissertation, Syracuse University
Conceptual Cognitive Organs: Toward an Historical-Materialist Theory of Scientific Knowledge.Siyaves Azeri - 2013 - Philosophia 41 (4):1095-1123.
Model-Based Reasoning in Scientific Discovery.L. Magnani, Nancy Nersessian & Paul Thagard (eds.) - 1999 - Kluwer/Plenum.
Scientific Reasoning Is Material Inference: Combining Confirmation, Discovery, and Explanation.Ingo Brigandt - 2010 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 24 (1):31-43.
Mathematical concepts and investigative practice.Dirk Schlimm - 2012 - In Uljana Feest & Friedrich Steinle (eds.), Scientific Concepts and Investigative Practice. De Gruyter. pp. 3--127.
Causes as probability raisers of processes.Jonathan Schaffer - 2001 - Journal of Philosophy 98 (2):75-92.
Model-based reasoning in conceptual change.Nancy J. Nersessian - 1999 - In L. Magnani, N. J. Nersessian & P. Thagard (eds.), Model-Based Reasoning in Scientific Discovery. Kluwer/Plenum. pp. 5--22.
How could Vygotsky inform an approach to scientific representations?Dimitris Kilakos - 2016 - Epistemology and Philosophy of Science 47 (1):140-152.
Variables of Scientific Concept Modeling and Their Formalization.Vladimir Kuznetsov - 2009 - In В.И Маркин (ed.), Philosophy of mathematics: current problems. Proceedings of the second international conference (Философия математики: актуальные проблемы. Тезисы второй международной конференции). pp. 268-270.
Evidence for mental-model-based reasoning: A comparison of reasoning with time and space concepts.Andre Vandierendonck - 1996 - Thinking and Reasoning 2 (4):249 – 272.
Analytics
Added to PP
2016-08-09
Downloads
77 (#159,070)
6 months
5 (#153,645)
2016-08-09
Downloads
77 (#159,070)
6 months
5 (#153,645)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
Deflationary representation, inference, and practice.Mauricio Suárez - 2015 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 49:36-47.
What makes interdisciplinarity difficult? Some consequences of domain specificity in interdisciplinary practice.Miles MacLeod - 2018 - Synthese 195 (2):697-720.
Of Water Drops and Atomic Nuclei: Analogies and Pursuit Worthiness in Science.Rune Nyrup - 2020 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 71 (3):881-903.
Metaphors in arts and science.Walter Veit & Ney Milan - 2021 - European Journal for Philosophy of Science 11 (2):1-24.