Social Science Information 59 (1):59-92 (2020)

Abstract
Epigenetics is a multifaceted field within genetics and genomics which focuses on discovering mechanisms involved in gene expression and regulation. It came to public attention around the turn of the millennium when the human genome began to be deciphered. Initial findings from epigenetics research held the promise of changing how we think about health and illness, evolution and heredity; speculations about how individuals and populations could begin to control such processes through epigenetics were then picked up in the public realm. In this article we concentrate on two normally distant domains within the public sphere: the advertising of alternative health products and services, and the promotion of alternative approaches to social science, especially around how social science deals with the ‘biosocial’. Using insights from social representations theory and methods aligned with metaphor analysis, we investigate the meanings of epigenetics rooted in the use of metaphors and commonplaces that are circulating in current popular parlance and that are used to promote academic theories and ideas as well as tangible products and services. We compare and contrast them and assess their implications for collaborations between natural and social scientists. Our findings reveal some surprising similarities between the metaphors and commonplaces used by advertisers and social scientists, based in large part on the fact that both groups draw on the work of prominent epigeneticists. In both instances some fundamental tenets of mainstream biology are contested, and hopes are created for improving individual or population well-being through the manipulation of epigenetic mechanisms. Both domains share some misunderstandings of epigenetics that might lead to problems with interdisciplinary collaborations between social and natural scientists.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1177/0539018419887110
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 63,195
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Weismann Rules! OK? Epigenetics and the Lamarckian Temptation.David Haig - 2007 - Biology and Philosophy 22 (3):415-428.
XII.—Metaphor.Max Black - 1955 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 55 (1):273-294.

View all 9 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Synthetic Biology, Metaphors and Responsibility.Carmen McLeod & Brigitte Nerlich - 2017 - Life Sciences, Society and Policy 13 (1):1-13.
Social Epigenetics and Equality of Opportunity.M. Loi, L. D. Savio & E. Stupka - 2013 - Public Health Ethics 6 (3):305-305.
Causal Explanation Beyond the Gene: Manipulation and Causality in Epigenetics.Jan Baedke - 2012 - Theoria : An International Journal for Theory, History and Fundations of Science 27 (2):153-174.
Epigenetic Responsibility.Maria Hedlund - 2012 - Medicine Studies 3 (3):171-183.
Epigenetic Exceptionalism.Mark A. Rothstein - 2013 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 41 (3):733-736.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2019-11-15

Total views
7 ( #1,037,082 of 2,448,320 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #450,727 of 2,448,320 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes