Argumentation 26 (1):55-69 (2012)
This article deals with the relationship between argumentation and persuasion. It defends the idea that these two concepts are not as opposed as all too often said. If it is important to recognize their differences (there are argumentative discourses without persuasion and persuasive discourses without argumentation), there is nevertheless an overlap, in which characteristics are taken from both. We propose to call this overlap “persuasive argumentation”. In order to bridge argumentation and persuasion, we will first distinguish the latter from manipulation. In the second part of this article, we will analyze four cases of persuasive argumentation: the enthymeme, a few rhetorical figures, narration and visual argumentation
|Keywords||Persuasion Persuasive argumentation Manipulation Enthymeme Visual argumentation Rhetorical figures|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
Essays on Actions and Events: Philosophical Essays Volume 1.Donald Davidson - 2001 - Clarendon Press.
No Caption Needed: Iconic Photographs, Public Culture, and Liberal Democracy.Robert Hariman & John Louis Lucaites - 2011 - University of Chicago Press.
Citations of this work BETA
The Study of Visual and Multimodal Argumentation.Jens E. Kjeldsen - 2015 - Argumentation 29 (2):115-132.
Similar books and articles
Arguing Without Trying to Persuade? Elements for a Non-Persuasive Definition of Argumentation.Raphaël Micheli - 2012 - Argumentation 26 (1):115-126.
Intrinsic Versus Instrumental Values of Argumentation: The Rhetorical Dimension of Argumentation. [REVIEW]Lilian Bermejo-Luque - 2010 - Argumentation 24 (4):453-474.
Argumentation Schemes in Persuasive Brochures.Peter Jan Schellens & Menno de Jong - 2004 - Argumentation 18 (3):295-323.
Conviction, Persuasion, and Argumentation: Untangling the Ends and Means of Influence. [REVIEW]Daniel J. O'Keefe - 2012 - Argumentation 26 (1):19-32.
Preaching to the Converted. Why Argue When Everyone Agrees?Marianne Doury - 2012 - Argumentation 26 (1):99-114.
Presumptions and the Distribution of Argumentative Burdens in Acts of Proposing and Accusing.Fred J. Kauffeld - 1997 - Argumentation 12 (2):245-266.
Dialectical Argumentation with Argumentation Schemes: An Approach to Legal Logic. [REVIEW]Bart Verheij - 2003 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 11 (2-3):167-195.
On Some Aristotelian Sources of Modern Argumentation Theory.Christof Rapp & Tim Wagner - 2013 - Argumentation 27 (1):7-30.
Complex Argumentation in a Critical Discussion.A. F. Snoeck Henkemans - 2003 - Argumentation 17 (4):405-419.
Added to index2011-10-04
Total downloads53 ( #99,993 of 2,178,142 )
Recent downloads (6 months)5 ( #54,729 of 2,178,142 )
How can I increase my downloads?