Navigating the Social Governance Gap

Abstract
When business organisations become involved in contributing to and resolving social issues, they enter areas traditionally seen as the purview of governments. In doing so, they begin to take on the expectations and responsibilities of government; they become politicised. This politicisation is a product of business’s success and power and appears largely unavoidable. Adopting Matten & Crane’s (2005a) extended view of corporate citizenship, business organisations’ responsibilities extend to the administration of citizens’ social, civil and political rights. We term these areas where business organisations take over the administration of citizenship rights as the social governance gap. Drawing upon the agenda of Margolis and Walsh (2003), we seek to enhance the understanding of how business navigates its responsibilities within the social governance gap, including its function as a significant actor influencing societal development and wellbeing. We do this through an exploration of Rio Tinto’s involvement in the WA Future Fund. This paper forms part of an introductory scoping case study of the Rio Tinto WA Future fund and its function as one of Rio Tinto’s diverse responses to community development issues in Western Australia
Keywords Business and Professional Ethics  Conference Proceedings  Social Science
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s) 978-0-9763264-4-1  
DOI iabsproc20071851
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 29,308
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
The Relevance of Social Audit for Oxfam GB.Elsa Dawson - 1998 - Journal of Business Ethics 17 (13):1457-1469.
Governance Theory and Practice for Nonprofit Organisations.Debbie M. Thorne & Beverly T. Venable - 2008 - International Journal of Business Governance and Ethics 4 (2):148.
Evolving Corporate Social Responsibility.Trevor Goddard & David Teller - 2006 - Proceedings of the International Association for Business and Society 17:98-103.
Corporate Governance Models in Emerging Markets: The Case of India.Silke Machold & Ajit Kumar Vasudevan - 2004 - International Journal of Business Governance and Ethics 1 (1):56-77.
Governance and Social Information Disclosure Evidence From the UK.Sepideh Parsa, Reza Kouhy & Christos Tzovas - 2007 - International Journal of Business Governance and Ethics 3 (3):205-222.
Governing as Governance.J. Kooiman - 2003 - Sage Publications.
Corporate Social Performance and the Governance Structure.Frank Jan de Graaf - 2005 - Proceedings of the International Association for Business and Society 16:225-229.
An Interpretive Structural Model of Corporate Governance.Dimple Grover, Ravi Shankar & Amulya Khurana - 2007 - International Journal of Business Governance and Ethics 3 (4):446-460.
Added to PP index
2012-09-18

Total downloads
6 ( #566,080 of 2,180,176 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #105,536 of 2,180,176 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums