Modern Theology 36 (1):76-89 (2020)

David Newheiser
Australian Catholic University
Giorgio Agamben argues that Christian thought provides the paradigm of modern governmental power, which reinforces mundane government by investing it with glory. Agamben claims that Dionysius the Areopagite exemplifies this structure; in his view, Dionysian negative theology serves to sacralize ecclesiastical power. In response, I argue that Dionysius desacralizes every authority, affirming that some things are sacred even as he subjects that affirmation to thoroughgoing critique. Against both dogmatic adherence and pure profanation, Dionysius models a politics that draws on the power of the sacred while holding it open to unpredictable development.
Keywords religion  political theology  agamben  biopolitics  mysticism  negative theology  politics
Categories (categorize this paper)
Reprint years 2020
DOI 10.1111/moth.12506
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Dionysius the Areopagite Between Orthodoxy and Heresy.Filip Ivanovic - 2011 - Newcastle upon Tyne, UK: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
Review of Giorgio Agamben Use of Bodies. [REVIEW]Eric D. Meyer - 2017 - Marxism and Philosophy Review of Books.
The Ecclesiology of Dionysius the Areopagite.Filip Ivanovic - 2011 - International Journal for the Study of the Christian Church 11 (1):27-44.


Added to PP index

Total views
91 ( #121,756 of 2,462,263 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
17 ( #45,513 of 2,462,263 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes