How not to integrate the history and philosophy of science: a reply to Chalmers

Abstract
Alan Chalmers uses Robert Boyle’s mechanical philosophy as an example of the irrelevance of ‘philosophy’ to ‘science’ and criticizes my 2006 book Atoms and alchemy for overemphasizing Boyle’s successes. The present paper responds as follows: first, it argues that Chalmers employs an overly simplistic methodology insensitive to the distinction between historical and philosophical claims; second, it shows that the central theses of Atoms and alchemy are untouched by Chalmers’s criticisms; and third, it uses Boyle’s analysis of subordinate causes and his debate with Henry More in the 1670s to demonstrate the inadequacy of Chalmers’s construal of the mechanical philosophy.Keywords: Robert Boyle; Alan Chalmers; Geber; Paul of Taranto; Daniel Sennert; Alchemy; Chymistry; Mechanical philosophy; Reduction to the pristine state
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1016/j.shpsa.2010.03.002
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 28,165
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
The Lack of Excellency of Boyle's Mechanical Philosophy.Alan Chalmers - 1993 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 24 (4):541-564.
Boyle and the Origins of Modern Chemistry: Newman Tried in the Fire.Alan F. Chalmers - 2010 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 41 (1):1-10.
Boyle on Science and the Mechanical Philosophy: A Reply to Chalmers.A. Pyle - 2002 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 33 (1):171-186.
Robert Boyle and the Heuristic Value of Mechanism.Peter R. Anstey - 2002 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 33 (1):157-170.
Experiment Versus Mechanical Philosophy in the Work of Robert Boyle: A Reply to Anstey and Pyle.A. Chalmers - 2002 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 33 (1):187-193.

View all 11 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Understanding Science Through its History: A Response to Newman.Alan Chalmers - 2011 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 42 (1):150-153.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Boyle on Science and the Mechanical Philosophy: A Reply to Chalmers.A. Pyle - 2002 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 33 (1):171-186.
Understanding Science Through its History: A Response to Newman.Alan Chalmers - 2011 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 42 (1):150-153.
Computational Processes: A Reply to Chalmers and Copeland.Cristian Cocos - 2002 - SATS: Northern European Journal of Philosophy 3 (2):25-49.
How to Defend Science Against Scepticism: A Reply to Barry Gower.Alan Chalmers - 1989 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 40 (2):249-253.
Boyle and the Origins of Modern Chemistry: Newman Tried in the Fire.Alan F. Chalmers - 2010 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 41 (1):1-10.
Planetary Distances and Copernican Theory: A Reply.Alan Chalmers - 1983 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 34 (4):372-374.
The Superiority of the Copernican System: A Reply to Chalmers.Martin Curd - 1983 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 34 (4):367-369.
The Varieties of Computation: A Reply.David Chalmers - 2012 - Journal of Cognitive Science 2012 (3):211-248.
Consciousness Disputed. [REVIEW]Janet Levin - 1997 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 48 (1):91-107.
Maxwell's Methodology and His.A. F. Chalmers - 1973 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 4 (2):107-164.
Experiment Versus Mechanical Philosophy in the Work of Robert Boyle: A Reply to Anstey and Pyle.A. Chalmers - 2002 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 33 (1):187-193.
The Lack of Excellency of Boyle's Mechanical Philosophy.Alan Chalmers - 1993 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 24 (4):541-564.
Intermediate Causes and Explanations: The Key to Understanding the Scientific Revolution.Alan Chalmers - 2012 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 43 (4):551-562.

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2010-09-14

Total downloads

20 ( #248,561 of 2,171,974 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

2 ( #173,676 of 2,171,974 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums