Philosophy 83 (1):117-127 (2008)

Anne Newstead
Swinburne University of Technology
James Franklin
University of New South Wales
This paper discusses an argument for the reality of the classical mathematical continuum. An inference to the best explanation type of argument is used to defend the idea that real numbers exist even when they cannot be constructively specified as with the "indefinable numbers"
Keywords continuum  real numbers  realism  indefinables
Categories (categorize this paper)
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Are Values Under‐Valued? A Reply to Christopher Ormell.Roger Straughan - 1993 - Journal of Moral Education 22 (1):47-50.
Ideology and School Mathamatics: Reply to C. P. Ormell.W. G. M. Elliott - 1969 - Journal of Philosophy of Education 3 (1):55–64.
Aristotle as A-Theorist: Overcoming the Myth of Passage.Jacqueline Mariña & Franklin Mason - 2001 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 39 (2):169-192.
Reply to David Harrah's Discussion Note.W. B. Gallie - 1959 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 10 (39):239-240.
Reply to Butchvarov’s “Russell’s Views on Reality”.Jan Dejnozka - 1988 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 32 (1):181-184.
Quantum Realism. Discussion Note: A Reply to Professor Fenner.Barbara J. Bennett - 1990 - Journal of Speculative Philosophy 4 (3):267 - 274.


Added to PP index

Total views
205 ( #51,227 of 2,454,809 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
36 ( #21,968 of 2,454,809 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes