Philosophical Studies 160 (1):53-78 (2012)
Some philosophers argue that many contemporary debates in metaphysics are “illegitimate,” “shallow,” or “trivial,” and that “contemporary analytic metaphysics, a professional activity engaged in by some extremely intelligent and morally serious people, fails to qualify as part of the enlightened pursuit of objective truth, and should be discontinued” (Ladyman and Ross, Every thing must go: Metaphysics naturalized , 2007 ). Many of these critics are explicit about their sympathies with Rudolf Carnap and his circle, calling themselves ‘neo-positivists’ or ‘neo-Carnapians.’ Yet despite the fact that one of the main conclusions of logical positivism was that metaphysical statements are meaningless, many of these neo-positivists are themselves engaged in metaphysical projects. This paper aims to clarify how we may see a neo-positivist metaphysics as proceeding in good faith, one that starts with serious engagement with the findings of science, particularly fundamental physics, but also has room for traditional, armchair methods
|Keywords||Metametaphysics Metaphysics Neopositivism Indispensability arguments|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
Wise Choices, Apt Feelings: A Theory of Normative Judgment.Allan Gibbard - 1990 - Harvard University Press.
Citations of this work BETA
Physicalism and Our Knowledge of Intrinsic Properties.Alyssa Ney - 2007 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 85 (1):41 – 60.
Nature, Purpose, and Norm: A Program in American Philosophy.Preston Stovall - 2016 - Journal of the American Philosophical Association 2 (4):617-636.
The Possibility of Naturalized Metaphysics.Rasmus Jaksland - 2016 - Dissertation, University of Copenhagen
Measurement and Metaphysics in van Fraassen's Scientific Representation.Sergio A. Gallegos - 2015 - Axiomathes 25 (1):117-131.
Similar books and articles
Review of James Ladyman and Don Ross, Every Thing Must Go: Metaphysics Naturalized. [REVIEW]Cian Dorr - 2010 - Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2010 (6).
Neo-Positivist or Neo-Kantian? Karl Popper and the Vienna Circle.Alexander Naraniecki - 2010 - Philosophy 85 (4):511-530.
In Defence of Aristotelian Metaphysics.Tuomas E. Tahko - 2012 - In Contemporary Aristotelian Metaphysics. Cambridge University Press. pp. 26-43.
Logic and Metaphysics: Heinrich Scholz and the Scientific World View.Volker Peckhaus - 2007 - Philosophia Mathematica 16 (1):78-90.
Causal Powers: A Neo-Aristotelian Metaphysic.Jonathan D. Jacobs - 2007 - Dissertation, Indiana University
On Seeing the Generative Possibilities of Dalit Neo-Buddhist Thought.Helen Verran - 2005 - Social Epistemology 19 (1):33 – 48.
What is the Purpose of Neo-Logicism?Marcus Rossberg & Philip A. Ebert - 2007 - Traveaux de Logique 18:33-61.
Can We Read Metaphysics Off Physics? Or, What Presentists Should Say About Special Relativity.Antony Eagle - unknown
Essentials of Contemporary Neo-Confucian Philosophy.Shuxian Liu - 2003 - Praeger.
Review: Makkreel and Luft (Eds.), Neo-Kantianism in Contemporary Philosophy. [REVIEW]Lydia Patton - 2010 - Philosophy in Review 30 (4):280-282.
Added to index2012-04-02
Total downloads284 ( #10,830 of 2,158,808 )
Recent downloads (6 months)18 ( #19,785 of 2,158,808 )
How can I increase my downloads?