Intending Recalcitrant Social Ends

Erkenntnis 87 (2):477-498 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

One can intend the actions of others, even when one believes such actions are not under one’s control. Call the objects of intentions “ends”; the ends that consist (partly or wholly) of other people’s actions “social”; and the ends that consist of things one believes one cannot control “recalcitrant”. The thesis, then, is that one can intend recalcitrant social ends. I present a positive argument in favor of this idea, and then argue against some purported conditions on the possible content of intentions that would rule out the possibility of intending such ends. The positive argument is the following: intentions are realized by a certain cluster of dispositions. One can come to be so disposed towards recalcitrant social ends. So one can come to be disposed toward such ends in the manner that realizes an intention. So one can intend recalcitrant social ends. The conditions against which I argue are known in the literature as the Own Action Condition, the Control Condition, and the Settle Condition. I present cases where, intuitively, agents genuinely intend ends that would be ruled out by these conditions.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Intending Recalcitrant Social Ends.Carlos Núñez - 2019 - Erkenntnis 87 (2):477-498.
Praxis and the ends of action in Suárez.David Gonzalez Ginocchio - 2017 - Anuario Filosófico 50 (2):371-396.
Requirements of intention in light of belief.Carlos Núñez - 2020 - Philosophical Studies 177 (9):2471-2492.
Can I Only Intend My Own Actions?Luca Ferrero - 2013 - In David Shoemaker (ed.), Oxford studies in agency and responsibility. Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp. (1) 70-94.
Animals in the Kingdom of Ends.Heather M. Kendrick - 2010 - Between the Species 13 (10):2.
Ends.Mark LeBar - 2004 - Social Theory and Practice 30 (4):507-533.
Defending double effect.Alison Hills - 2003 - Philosophical Studies 116 (2):133-152.
A causal theory of intending.Wayne A. Davis - 1984 - American Philosophical Quarterly 21 (1):43-54.
Do Theodicists Mean What They Say?Clement Dore - 1974 - Philosophy 49 (190):357 - 374.
How is Recalcitrant Emotion Possible?Hagit Benbaji - 2013 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 91 (3):577-599.
An Anatomy of Values. [REVIEW]S. C. A. - 1971 - Review of Metaphysics 25 (2):352-352.
Satisficing and optimality.Michael Byron - 1998 - Ethics 109 (1):67-93.
Setting ends for oneself through reason.Andrews Reath - 2009 - In Simon Robertson (ed.), Spheres of Reason. Oxford University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-03-19

Downloads
8 (#1,287,956)

6 months
4 (#790,687)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Carlos Núñez
Oxford University

References found in this work

Intentionality: An Essay in the Philosophy of Mind.John R. Searle - 1983 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
Intentionality: An Essay in the Philosophy of Mind.John R. Searle - 1983 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Intention, plans, and practical reason.Michael Bratman - 1987 - Cambridge: Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Meaning.Herbert Paul Grice - 1957 - Philosophical Review 66 (3):377-388.

View all 33 references / Add more references