Philosophical Studies 176 (4):981-1002 (2019)

Authors
Matthew Strohl
University of Montana
C. Thi Nguyen
University of Utah
Abstract
What could ground normative restrictions concerning cultural appropriation which are not grounded by independent considerations such as property rights or harm? We propose that such restrictions can be grounded by considerations of intimacy. Consider the familiar phenomenon of interpersonal intimacy. Certain aspects of personal life and interpersonal relationships are afforded various protections in virtue of being intimate. We argue that an analogous phenomenon exists at the level of large groups. In many cases, members of a group engage in shared practices that contribute to a sense of common identity, such as wearing certain hair or clothing styles or performing a certain style of music. Participation in such practices can generate relations of group intimacy, which can ground certain prerogatives in much the same way that interpersonal intimacy can. One such prerogative is making what we call an appropriation claim. An appropriation claim is a request from a group member that non-members refrain from appropriating a given element of the group’s culture. Ignoring appropriation claims can constitute a breach of intimacy. But, we argue, just as for the prerogatives of interpersonal intimacy, in many cases there is no prior fact of the matter about whether the appropriation of a given cultural practice constitutes a breach of intimacy. It depends on what the group decides together.
Keywords Culture  Cultural Appropriation  Applied Ethics  Group Agency  Intimacy  Cultural Ethics  Applied Ethics  Communities
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s)
DOI 10.1007/s11098-018-1223-3
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Cultural Appropriation Without Cultural Essentialism?Erich Hatala Matthes - 2016 - Social Theory and Practice 42 (2):343-366.
Cultural Appropriation and Oppression.Erich Matthes - 2019 - Philosophical Studies 176 (4):1003-1013.

View all 23 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Cultural appropriation and aesthetic normativity.Phyllis Pearson - forthcoming - Philosophical Studies:1-15.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Cultural Appropriation and Oppression.Erich Matthes - 2019 - Philosophical Studies 176 (4):1003-1013.
The Ethics of Cultural Heritage.Erich Hatala Matthes - 2018 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
“Comment Me Back”: Expectations of Intimacy in the Culture of Blog.Kalynne Hackney Pudner - 2007 - International Journal of Applied Philosophy 21 (1):65-71.
Art, Authenticity and Appropriation.James O. Young - 2006 - Frontiers of Philosophy in China 1 (3):455-476.
Cultural Appropriation Without Cultural Essentialism?Erich Hatala Matthes - 2016 - Social Theory and Practice 42 (2):343-366.
Kinship and Intimacy.Hugh LaFollette - 2017 - Nordic Journal of Applied Ethics 11 (1):33-40.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2018-12-13

Total views
1,018 ( #3,557 of 2,343,506 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
341 ( #953 of 2,343,506 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes