Expertise and the fragmentation of intellectual autonomy

Philosophical Inquiries 6 (2):107-124 (2018)
Authors
C. Thi Nguyen
Utah Valley University
Abstract
In The Great Endarkenment, Elijah Millgram argues that the hyper-specialization of expert domains has led to an intellectual crisis. Each field of human knowledge has its own specialized jargon, knowledge, and form of reasoning, and each is mutually incomprehensible to the next. Furthermore, says Millgram, modern scientific practical arguments are draped across many fields. Thus, there is no person in a position to assess the success of such a practical argument for themselves. This arrangement virtually guarantees that mistakes will accrue whenever we engage in cross-field practical reasoning. Furthermore, Millgram argues, hyper-specialization makes intellectual autonomy extremely difficult. Our only hope is to provide better translations between the fields, in order to achieve intellectual transparency. I argue against Millgram’s pessimistic conclusion about intellectual autonomy, and against his suggested solution of translation. Instead, I take his analysis to reveal that there are actually several very distinct forms intellectual autonomy that are significantly in tension. One familiar kind is direct autonomy, where we seek to understand arguments and reasons for ourselves. Another kind is delegational autonomy, where we seek to find others to invest with our intellectual trust when we cannot understand. A third is management autonomy, where we seek to encapsulate fields, in order to manage their overall structure and connectivity. Intellectual transparency will help us achieve direct autonomy, but many intellectual circumstances require that we exercise delegational and management autonomy. However, these latter forms of autonomy require us to give up on transparency.
Keywords Expertise  Trust  Testimony  Intellectual autonomy  autonomy  Elijah Millgram  The Great Endarkenment  Hyperspecialization
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Testimony and Intellectual Autonomy.C. A. J. Coady - 2002 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 33 (2):355-372.
Testimony and Intellectual Autonomy.C. Coady - 2002 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 33 (2):355-372.
Autonomy as Intellectual Virtue.Kyla Ebels-Duggan - 2015 - In Harry Brighouse & Michael MacPherson (eds.), The Aims of Higher Education: Problems of Morality and Justice. Chicago, IL, USA:
Autonomy, Sexuality, and Intellectual Disability.Andria Bianchi - 2016 - Social Philosophy Today 32:107-121.
Autonomy, Consent and the Law.Sheila McLean - 2010 - Routledge-Cavendish.
Paternalism in the Name of Autonomy.Manne Sjöstrand, Stefan Eriksson, Niklas Juth & Gert Helgesson - 2013 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 38 (6):jht049.
Education for Autonomy and Open-Mindedness in Diverse Societies.Rebecca M. Taylor - 2017 - Educational Philosophy and Theory 49 (14):1326-1337.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2018-09-16

Total downloads
60 ( #105,199 of 2,275,165 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
60 ( #5,729 of 2,275,165 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature