BMC Medical Ethics 20 (1):1-7 (2019)

Authors
Abstract
Rare Disease research has seen tremendous advancements over the last decades, with the development of new technologies, various global collaborative efforts and improved data sharing. To maximize the impact of and to further build on these developments, there is a need for model consent clauses for rare diseases research, in order to improve data interoperability, to meet the informational needs of participants, and to ensure proper ethical and legal use of data sources and participants’ overall protection. A global Task Force was set up to develop model consent clauses specific to rare diseases research, that are comprehensive, harmonized, readily accessible, and internationally applicable, facilitating the recruitment and consent of rare disease research participants around the world. Existing consent forms and notices of consent were analyzed and classified under different consent themes, which were used as background to develop the model consent clauses. The IRDiRC-GA4GH MCC Task Force met in September 2018, to discuss and design model consent clauses. Based on analyzed consent forms, they listed generic core elements and designed the following rare disease research specific core elements; Rare Disease Research Introductory Clause, Familial Participation, Audio/Visual Imaging, Collecting, storing, sharing of rare disease data, Recontact for matching, Data Linkage, Return of Results to Family Members, Incapacity/Death, and Benefits. The model consent clauses presented in this article have been drafted to highlight consent elements that bear in mind the trends in rare disease research, while providing a tool to help foster harmonization and collaborative efforts.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1186/s12910-019-0390-x
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 53,617
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

The Ethics Weathervane.Bartha Maria Knoppers & Ruth Chadwick - 2015 - BMC Medical Ethics 16 (1):1-5.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

The Genetic Family as Patient?Bartha Maria Knoppers & Kristina Kekesi-Lafrance - 2020 - American Journal of Bioethics 20 (6):77-80.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

The Consent Problem Within DNA Biobanks.Darren Shickle - 2006 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 37 (3):503-519.
Parental Consent for Newborn Screening in Southern Taiwan.M.-C. Huang - 2005 - Journal of Medical Ethics 31 (11):621-624.
Juliette: A Model of Sexual Consent.Kavanagh Chandra - 2016 - Journal of the International Network for Sexual Ethics and Politics 4 (1):43-54.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2019-08-02

Total views
16 ( #595,119 of 2,348,768 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #330,190 of 2,348,768 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes