Unable to Do the Impossible

Mind 129 (514):585-602 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Jack Spencer has recently argued for the striking thesis that, possibly, an agent is able to do the impossible—that is, perform an action that is metaphysically impossible for that person to perform. Spencer bases his argument on (Simple G), a case in which it is impossible for an agent G to perform some action but, according to Spencer, G is still intuitively able to perform that action. I reply that we would have to give up at least four action-theoretical principles if we accept that G is able to do the impossible. We may be best off retaining the principles and thus rejecting Spencer's intuition that G is able to do the impossible. I then consider an argument for the claim that G is able to do the impossible that goes through the Snapshot Principle. I, however, deny that any true variant of the Snapshot Principle shows that G is able to do the impossible. Moreover, the counterexample to the Snapshot Principle that I develop also suggests that G is unable to do the impossible in (Simple G). The most natural explanation for why an agent is unable to perform some action in this counterexample extends to (Simple G). Next, I develop three error theories for why we might initially share Spencer's intuition that G is able to do the impossible in (Simple G). Finally, I consider a couple other "G-cases" of Spencer's and find them all wanting. Perhaps we are unable to do the impossible.

Similar books and articles

Reasoning with Moral Conflicts.John F. Horty - 2003 - Noûs 37 (4):557–605.
What Are Impossible Worlds?Barak Krakauer - 2013 - Philosophical Studies 165 (3):989-1007.
Able to Do the Impossible.Jack Spencer - 2017 - Mind 126 (502):466-497.
‘Ought’ Does Not Imply ‘Can’.Moti Mizrahi - 2009 - Philosophical Frontiers 4 (1):19-35.
A Tale of Two Parts.Andrew J. Jaeger - 2014 - Res Philosophica 91 (3):477-484.
Trying the Impossible: Reply to Adams.Kirk A. Ludwig - 1995 - Journal of Philosophical Research 20:563-570.
Real Impossible Worlds : The Bounds of Possibility.Ira Georgia Kiourti - 2010 - Dissertation, University of St Andrews
Impossible Worlds.Mark Jago - 2013 - Noûs 47 (3):713-728.
Rescuing PAP From Widerker's Brain-Malfunction Case.Greg Janzen - 2015 - Journal of Cognition and Neuroethics 3 (2):1-22.
Concrete Impossible Worlds.Martin Vacek - 2013 - Filozofia 68 (6):523-530.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-09-01

Downloads
591 (#15,431)

6 months
37 (#28,854)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Anthony Nguyen
University of Southern California

Citations of this work

Killing Time Again.Kadri Vihvelin - 2020 - The Monist 103 (3):312-327.
The Ability to Do Otherwise and the New Dispositionalism.Romy Jaster - 2022 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 65 (9):1149-1166.
Sceptical Deliberations.Simon-Pierre Chevarie-Cossette - 2020 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 101 (3):383-408.
No Choice for Incompatibilism.Julio De Rizzo - forthcoming - Thought: A Journal of Philosophy.

Add more citations

References found in this work

On the Plurality of Worlds.David K. Lewis - 1986 - Revue Philosophique de la France Et de l'Etranger 178 (3):388-390.
The Paradoxes of Time Travel.David K. Lewis - 1976 - American Philosophical Quarterly 13 (2):145-152.
What 'Must' and 'Can' Must and Can Mean.Angelika Kratzer - 1977 - Linguistics and Philosophy 1 (3):337--355.
On the Plurality of Worlds.Allen Stairs - 1988 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 49 (2):333-352.
Are We Free to Break the Laws?David Lewis - 1981 - Theoria 47 (3):113-21.

View all 25 references / Add more references