Noûs 44 (2):305-328 (2010)

Authors
Bernhard Nickel
Harvard University
Abstract
Theories of explanation seek to tell us what distinctively explanatory information is. The most ambitious ones, such as the DN-account, seek to tell us what an explanation is, tout court. Less ambitious ones, such as causal theories, restrict themselves to a particular domain of inquiry. The least ambitious theories constitute outright skepticism, holding that there is no reasonably unified phenomenon to give an account of. On these views, it is impossible to give any theories of explanation at all. I argue that both the less ambitious and outright skeptical varieties are committed to a certain context-sensitivity of our explanatory discourse. And though this discourse is almost certainly context-sensitive in some respects, it does not exhibit the context-sensitivity less than fully ambitious theories are committed to. Therefore, all accounts that seek to restrict themselves in scope, including causal accounts of explanation, fail
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/j.1468-0068.2010.00741.x
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 60,949
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

The Scientific Image.C. Van Fraassen Bas - 1980 - Oxford University Press.
Literal Meaning.François Recanati - 2002 - Cambridge University Press.

View all 42 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

A Logic for 'Because'.Benjamin Schnieder - 2011 - Review of Symbolic Logic 4 (3):445-465.
Counterfactual Scheming.Sam Baron - 2020 - Mind 129 (514):535-562.
Explanatory Priority Monism.Isaac Wilhelm - 2021 - Philosophical Studies 178 (4):1339-1359.
Backing Without Realism.Elanor Taylor - forthcoming - Erkenntnis:1-21.

View all 11 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

What Should We Expect of a Theory of Explanation?Barbara V. E. Klein - 1980 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1980:319 - 328.
Explanation in Morphology.P. Dullemeijer - 1972 - Acta Biotheoretica 21 (3-4):260-273.
On the Explanation of Inertia.Adán Sus - 2014 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 45 (2):293-315.
Inertial Motion, Explanation, and the Foundations of Classical Spacetime Theories.James Owen Weatherall - 2017 - In Dennis Lehmkuhl, Gregor Schiemann & Erhard Scholz (eds.), Towards a Theory of Spacetime Theories. Boston, USA: Birkhauser. pp. 13-42.
On the Eliminative Explanation of Social Theories.Raimo Tuomela - 1983 - Studia Logica 42 (2-3):331 - 345.
Best Theory Scientific Realism.Gerald Doppelt - 2014 - European Journal for Philosophy of Science 4 (2):271-291.
The Logic of Explanation in Anthropology.S. T. Goh - 1970 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 13 (1-4):339 – 359.
General Relativity and the Standard Model: Why Evidence for One Does Not Disconfirm the Other.Nicholaos Jones - 2008 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 40 (2):124-132.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
675 ( #9,011 of 2,439,388 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
9 ( #72,615 of 2,439,388 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes